Science Shows Conservatives Don't Believe in Science Anymore

BearMtnHIB wrote: Here I will now show- using the same scientific logic as the so called "scientists" that conducted this study, that Science Chick has an agenda about Man made Climate Change.

Yes, I do now after careful consideration of both sides of the argument over 2+ years of studying the data myself.

BearMtnHIB wrote: See the facts show by reading her posts, that Science Chick has never considered the possibility that nature changes the climate by itself- without man at all- my evidence is solid- there have been heat waves and ice ages- long before man ever farted a molecule of methane or before woman ever exhaled a breath of CO2.

And you would be wrong http://www.pinecam.com/phpBB2/viewtopic ... highlight=
Or go back to any of my early posts on global warming and you will see that I wasn't as adamant as I am now, because I was still early in my journey for the truth. I've certainly kept a more open mind that you have. And if you listen to the climate scientists, instead of the contrarians who make your mind up for you, you would know that they do not dismiss the effects of natural variables at all, on the contrary they readily admit that there are natural forces at work even now; however, they do not and will not come anywhere close to the size of the effects of the human influences on climate occurring right now, and that is the problem. We're messing with something that will come back to bite us in the @$$.

But we will ignore all those facts- the evidence shows an agenda- always in support of man made climate change. Show me any supporting posts to the contrary. We can even include todays topic "Everything that is good for the environment is a job".

Yes, until the evidence shows otherwise because the evidence supporting it is overwhelming at this point and I'm not one to keep denying that which is reality. Why did you ignore the facts I presented about rising CO2 concentrations and the greenhouse effect CO2 has in the atmosphere, readily measured and easily quantified?

BearMtnHIB wrote: The evidence is clear- she's got it all figured out, despite many man made pro-climate change experts changing their minds about the matter. There are dozens of articles she could have referenced that point to an open mind on the issue- but I have never seen one posted by her. She's as sure about it as LJ is sure there is no god.

And as I said in that thread I linked above, show me credible scientific evidence that explains the warming based purely on natural sources? No one has yet, I look forward to that evidence as it would mean that we aren't headed down an ugly, tragic path. I, and many other scientists, would be glad to be wrong about anthropogenic global warming. And I have posted before that the initial claims on increasing frequencies of hurricanes was too preliminary to make that conclusion, and that turned out to be true.

I can thereby conclude - that SC has an agenda- not by the "science", but by the political agenda. Just show me some evidence where any post is questioning man made climate change and I will retract my conclusion, but until then my agenda theory should be accepted as fact by all you liberal sheep!

And when have you ever seen me quote political sources to justify my claims? I don't - I quote the science, as evidenced by my earlier post in this thread asking you basics concerning the rising CO2 concentrations and effects - that's not politics, that's pure observation through the scientific method. You conveniently ignore that fact yourself. You, sir, have an agenda of your own based on superstition, misinformed talking points, and fear of government control, neither of which will solve the problems at hand. You wanna learn the science, and not the political agenda, go to the source (and it's not the media).


From https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater