CinnamonGirl wrote: Fine, president Obama you are perfect. You should have done just what you did last night. I take it all back.
You would make my life easier by not coming here every few days and shutting down our traffic but you are the man. We should bow to your every whim, never say a word about you. And certainly never second guess a thing. There you go, I hope I made you all happy.
Really? So this was all about you? You don't want the president here messing up traffic and interfering with your ability to get around town, instead you want to send him to LA where he actually would cause a major disruption to the area in the midst of a natural disaster....then when this is pointed out to you, you get all snarky?
CinnamonGirl wrote: Archer, I have a right to my opinion. Get used to it. I think you were getting snarky.
Who posted that you didn't have a right to your opinion? You complained about Obama being in Colorado, you suggested he should be in LA. We disagreed...then you got snarky with your "perfect Obama" post, and now you are trying to blame me for being snarky? Sounds more like you are upset that I dared to disagree with you.
The spirit of my post was not about telling him what he can and cannot do. I really do think he looks desperate, my opinion. All conventions talk about the other party so for him to say that gives him cover to buck tradition was something I have never seen before. I think he looks desperate by doing it. It does not look presidential. My opinion. I am sad that they are going to do this now.
So, I am guessing we all need to get used to this for the next few months because we all are going to be disagreeing. But I can't really agree to disagree because in my mind you were not responding to what I was talking about. And that is what made it seem snarky to me. If it wasn't my apologies. And I admit to being very sarcastic. I do however accept that we both are on different sides of the coin and I would like to be sure we are all good.
