Romney has no use for 47% of Americans

Something the Dog Said wrote: No hate, just disgust. I believe a president should be the president for all americans. But of course you have nothing to add to the discussion as usual.

What universe is it that you are inhabiting where the desire to be a president that replaces dependency on government with self sufficiency isn't a president for all of us? Are people not better off when they are capable of being self sufficient than they are being dependent on the government for their daily existence? Just because Romney recognizes that he is unlikely to gain the votes of those he is seeking to help to help him become president doesn't mean he doesn't want to help them better their current situation. Wouldn't families be better off if they were capable of purchasing their own food than they are being dependent on the subsidy of the government to feed themselves? Of course they would be, anyone with a brain and the common sense of a fence post recognizes that. Are they likely to take the steps necessary to achieve that goal when their food subsidy, their rent subsidy, and their welfare payments all constantly grow larger when those steps aren't taken?

When the candidate states that it is not his job to be responsible for 47% of Americans. When the candidate disregards the contribution of 47% of Americans, including combat veterans, troops deployed in combat zones, seniors who have worked and paid taxes for decades, injured military veterans recuperating in VA hospitals, and millions of others and tells them they are shirking personal responsibility.

Not being worried about getting votes from those who vote for their living isn't quite the same thing as not being responsible to them when he is elected president, is it Dog?

FredHayek wrote: Disgust? The Left here likes to claim the right is full of hate, but they way they characterize their opponents, it looks like the hate is all yours. Like Obama? Do I hate him or regard him with disgust? Nope, more like a introvert who doesn't have the people skills or political ability to actually get stuff done.

Wheras you regard a family man who gives millions to charities and had done well in a number of fields of business and politics as a scumbag. Irony, he has done more with his checkbook to help out people in a year than you could hope to do in a lifetime.

Where have I stated that I hate anyone? Romney has also destroyed families, encouraged forced slavery like conditions, looted companies out of their assets, and yes, disregarded the contributions of our combat veterans, our injured military, our seniors who have worked hard their lives and paid their taxes, and then are told they are shirking their personal responsibilities.

Romney has tithed to his church in order to maintain his status in the church. whether or not that has helped out other people is debatable. I don't judge an individual based on his ability to accumulate wealth, but on his character, and I find his character lacking based on his words and deeds. Just because someone has large offshore accounts in tax havens does not mean he can not be a scum bag.

And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

Matthew 7:1, "Judge not that ye be not judged."

PrintSmith wrote: Not being worried about getting votes from those who vote for their living isn't quite the same thing as not being responsible to them when he is elected president, is it Dog?

Romney went on: "[M]y job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."

So those injured combat veterans recuperating from traumatic brain injuries are "voting their living". those seniors collecting Social Security after decades of working and paying taxes are "voting their living". Those combat troops putting their lives on the line in Afghanistan are just "voting their living".

Romney has made it clear and doubled down that he will not worry about 47% of Americans, that he considers 47% of Americans do not take personal responsiblity for their lives. It is clear what you and he think of 47% of your fellow Americans.

BearMtnHIB wrote: Matthew 7:1, "Judge not that ye be not judged."

I live my life as though I am judged by my every action. Are you comfortable in yours? Particularly advocating violence and murder against those who do not follow your political viewpoints?

BearMtnHIB wrote: Matthew 7:1, "Judge not that ye be not judged."

Unless your the SFAC.... you might be one too!

I find it ironic that the left bitches - whines- and complains about people like Romney or the 5%- who already pay the vast majority of the income taxes,

Yet they don't seem to give a hoot that half the country are tax deadbeats. How long do you think that the top 5% can keep carrying the weight of the bottom 95%?

How long can we keep paying the bills for half a country that contributes nothing?

In fact we are 16 trillion in the hole right now- and no end in sight.

Answer; not very much longer at all.

BearMtnHIB wrote: Matthew 7:1, "Judge not that ye be not judged."

Uh, huh.

BearMtnHIB wrote: While Romney never said that he has no use for these looters- I'm here to say it! I have no use for them, they are lazy- good for nothings.

and

Yet they don't seem to give a hoot that half the country are tax deadbeats.