Romney has no use for 47% of Americans

Fox News has Obama +5.

It's OK to be below 50% if your opponent is five points below you.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... -1171.html

Like I said......Lemmings

I almost did this yesterday.

‎"Finally a candidate with the courage to say half of all Americans are freeloaders who believe they're entitled to food. What do they think, food grows on trees?" -- Stephen Colbert http://on.cc.com/QC0gz0

8 Very Bad Things That Happened to Mitt Romney...Just This Morning

Yesterday was a no good, very bad day for the Romney’s campaign, who had to mop up the mess their candidate created when he said that “47 percent” of Americans are “dependent on government” and “believe they are victims.” But the bad news hasn’t stopped today.

From poll numbers to Republican politicians throwing Romney under the bus, the campaign’s woes continue.

Even his VP offered criticism.

1. Ryan Says Romney Was ‘Inarticulate’

Mitt Romney’s vice-presidential candidate called the “47 percent” comments “inarticulate” in an interview with a local news station in Nevada. “He was obviously inarticulate in making this point,” said Paul Ryan. Asked by a reporter if Romney regrets his comments, Ryan said, “I think he would have said it differently, that’s for sure.”

http://www.alternet.org/hot-news-views/ ... st-morning

The implication that I find most hilarious about this whole thing is the one where I am to believe that President Obama is for ALL Americans. Really? That's what he suggested on David Letterman in his own words. It hasn't felt like that to me for the better part of the past four years.

What I have seen is a President and party with a radical agenda ramrodding some radical legislation through the system by any means possible as quickly as possible before the window of opportunity closes. His efforts on healthcare, GITMO and immigration come to mind. Neither he nor the Dems cared what roughly half of America thought about these issues enough to really ask an opinion. It was full speed ahead. Little discussion, back room deals. You know I'm right because history supports this.

Please Mr. President, don't stand out there and try to suggest that you are FOR me. I'm not buying that BS. Actions speak much louder than words....and your actions have told me where you are taking our country. I was hoping there would be some discussion and compromise but that has not been the case. It's your way or the highway and that's no way to lead a country.

So President Obama is losing the votes of the "angry white males" (per Sen. Graham) who never voted for him in the first place. Just because the far right wingers do not get their way does not mean that the majority of America is not supportive of the President. Ramrodding radical legislation through the system? Really? His "agenda" was clear when he was nominated, his agenda re health care, GITMO and immigration were well known when the American public voted him and his agenda into the Presidency. America spoke, and America will reiterate their views when he is reelected this November.

Something the Dog Said wrote: So President Obama is losing the votes of the "angry white males" (per Sen. Graham) who never voted for him in the first place. Just because the far right wingers do not get their way does not mean that the majority of America is not supportive of the President. Ramrodding radical legislation through the system? Really? His "agenda" was clear when he was nominated, his agenda re health care, GITMO and immigration were well known when the American public voted him and his agenda into the Presidency. America spoke, and America will reiterate their views when he is reelected this November.

I don't think you have your facts right. When Obama was vague and all about Hope and Change, people voted for him in record numbers, when America found out what they actually got, they took Congress from him in 2010. And it looks like Congress & the Senate will become more Republican in 2012. If America loves Barack why is his approval rate still below 50% and why aren't the do-nothing Republican congress replaced?