what REALLY led to Benghazi massacre

True, Hilary has to take charge, because Obama leads from behind and usually only attends 2-3 intelligence briefings a week.

Of course, you have a link that proves he missed some briefing where that topic was discussed?

Like Obama is going to supply what days he skipped the meeting. In this administration the buck stops on Hilary Clinton's desk. Just like she predicted in the debate with Obama four years ago. With Obama it is who will take the blame for my deficiencies. A real stand up guy.

All we really need to know is that he didn't know it was a terrorist attack. They says plenty.
Why didn't he know?
Even the president on west wing knew when there was a problem. If they can do it on tv......surely the President can be made aware of little things like an act of war perpetrated on American citizens.

Saw this on Facebook...it says a lot about his disrespect.

Becky wrote: Saw this on Facebook...it says a lot about his disrespect.

I posted this yesterday on my Facebook and people jumped all over it. Do people here think it is photoshopped? With Barack, personally I am impressed that he even bothers to salute, even if it is a weak a** one while he is on the phone.

Becky wrote: Saw this on Facebook...it says a lot about his disrespect.

Those are just Obama's peasants... no need to interupt his "important" call.

As for the topic, I wonder if Obama was informed on his cell phone or in person about the two prior attacks on our consolate in Libya? Seems to me that a real leader would have thought to himself "gee, maybe we should make sure our people are properly protected since we don't really know how stable this new government is". The security of our citizens is the ultimate responsibilty of the president. Hillary can fall on the sword all she wants but the buck stops with Obama. Think about it... two attacks before 9/11 and our ambassador is guarded by a handful of Libyans who surely can't be expected to risk their lives for our people. If the area was not secure, or there wasn't enough funding to pay for security (which was proven false by Lamb), then why did we just leave Stevens there? And why was Obama still talking about the video two weeks later when he knew full well there was no protest in the first place? This story should have been the dominant front page news across the country, but since Obama is the man, it keeps getting buried on page 3. Our press overall is worthless and journalists are no better than ambulance chasing scumbag lawyers.

Have you ever seen a US Embassy in Europe? It is like an armed fortress. The Euros hate them because they often fence off the sidewalk, are unsightly and don't fit in with the neighborhood. This is in countries that are stable allies. But in Libya, our ambassador gets a British unarmed security team. Really? Really? After Kadaffi's arsenals had all been looted and individual citizens now owned tanks, the Obama administration assigns the guy a weaponless security team.

I recall a President sitting in a classroom with children when someone bent down and whispered in his ear.
Couldn't someone have whispered in the current Presidents ear?

Becky wrote: Saw this on Facebook...it says a lot about his disrespect.

... speaking of disrespect...



You guys are really getting desperate.