what REALLY led to Benghazi massacre

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l?ITO=1490

"Hillary Clinton reveals what REALLY led to Benghazi massacre - and demolishes White House claim it was triggered by anti-Islam film
Announcement of State Department dissent from rest of Obama administration could help protect Clinton during 2016 presidential run


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z29HsUoXUP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Bob! Get with the program man. The Dems desperately need to bury this whole Benghazi massacre thing at least until after November 6th. The "transparent" administration certainly doesn't want to talk about it because it may jeopardize re-election prospects with the realization of the magnitude of failed foreign policy by the American people. Fortunately, the "fair and balanced" US media is in deep for the re-election of their chosen guy so they, too, want to bury this travesty for a while.

I'm certain the investigation into why an American ambassador and consolate was left so vulnerable in the middle of a combat zone will all come to light sometime in the new year. The blame line will be all worked out and I'm certain the National Security Council's principles will be clean as the driven snow. :Whistle

In the meantime, neither the Administration nor the media really want to talk about this. It's really quite embarrassing. So please, please just drop it okay?

Now we just need someone to get to the UK media and get THEM to SHUT THE HELL UP!

I don't know what you all read or listen to, but this issue has been all over the mainstream media as has criticism of Obama and the administration.

Ambassodor Steven's family has requested that Romney quit politicizing the death of their son until the facts are in evidence.

“It would really be abhorrent to make this into a campaign issue,” Jan Stevens, 77, said in a telephone interview from his home in Loomis, California, as he prepares for a memorial service for his son next week.
Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee, has criticized President Barack Obama for not providing adequate security in Libya, saying the administration has left the country exposed to a deadly terrorist attack.
The ambassador’s father, a lawyer, said politicians should await the findings of a formal investigation before making accusations or judgments.
“The security matters are being adequately investigated,” Stevens said. “We don’t pretend to be experts in security. It has to be objectively examined. That’s where it belongs. It does not belong in the campaign arena.” Stevens said he has been getting briefings from the State Department on the progress of the investigation.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-1 ... s-dad.html

I'd just like one question answered which nobody seems to know. Where did Susan Rice get the story that there was a spontanious protest started because of a video? There was real time video that showed no protest, there were prior attacks in the area, it happened on 9/11, and our intel knew it was a terrorist attack within the first 24 hours.

Where did she get that story? Did she make it up herself?

Watch the investigation not be finished until after the election so they can avoid answering those troubling questions.

The right is so predictable: Republicans can't attack Obama on the economy or unemployment. They're both improving. So they try to make the ongoing Benghazi investigation a point in the campaign. And while the death of three people is very sad, it is nowhere near a "massacre," as lionshead tries to paint it.

I'm glad they won't hurry the investigation into what happened for political purposes. I hope they do a methodical investigation and let the chips fall where they may.

Raees wrote: I hope they do a methodical investigation and let the chips fall where they may.

I hope they do the same thing for whoever shot up the Dem headquarters in Denver... And I hope they manage to do it before the election...

Four people dead.