- Posts: 14880
- Thank you received: 27
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It was a BS answer then and it still is smelly months later.LadyJazzer wrote: Asked...and answered...back in November...
You need some new material...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote:
homeagain wrote: MIGHT have something to do with the article the WSJ ran on Nov.2,2012.......WSJ: STATE DEPT AND CIA HAD SECRET
BOTCHED DEAL FOR BENGHAZI SECURITY........"The CIA is said to have been the dominant US presence in Benghazi,where
it had a "symbiotic" relationship with the State Dept consulate that served as cover for its staff. "The State Department
believed it had a formal agreement with the CIA to provide backup security.",the Journal says, "although a congressional in-
vestigator said it now appears the CIA DIDN'T have the same understanding about security responsibilities."....(Oops...)
THIS piece of information plays a HUGE role in the fubar....LACK of communication, assumptions and NOW CYA is in play....(which is
VERY typical of our government in general....JMO
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote:
It was a BS answer then and it still is smelly months later.LadyJazzer wrote: Asked...and answered...back in November...
You need some new material...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: So, the disgraced Broadwell, who was apparently mouthing off about things that were above her pay-grade, is the new source of outrage-of-the-day material?
Yep....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote: Lincoln was correct, you can fool some of the people all of the time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote:
towermonkey wrote: What we learned is that it is okay for Obama to lie now because the shrub did it first. Nice to see that we are setting higher standards for our elected officials.
Interesting that the basis for that argument is an admission that "The guy we voted for, TWICE, was a liar and a screw-up, so you should pick someone who isn't as bad as OUR guy."
But then, you knew that...(And it isn't new information.)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Oh my naive archer, how much evidence do you need? The coverup wasn't as much about the ignored requests for more security, or the warnings of terrorist elements in the area, or the fact that there were prior attacks that WE didn't hear about... they covered up the reason for the attack which they have all admitted they knew right away. Yet the state dept and WH changed the CIA talking points to reflect the story they wanted us to hear. To have a terrorist attack on 9/11 after numerous warnings would not be hepful prior to the election. Obama stretched the video story out longer than anyone until he no longer could.archer wrote: But, but, but.........the hearings.....surely they found the "smoking gun".....surely they got to the bottom of this blatant cover-up, surely someone explained how Obama and Hillary, with malice aforethought, tried to cover-up.....uh what? what were they covering up.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.