Will Team Obama give the producers of the TV movie the classifiied info they need? Like they did with the Osama kill movie?
Boxes of classified info was found in the home of Petraeus's lover. The general denies giving it to her. Do they normally let reservists take home secret files?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: Will Team Obama give the producers of the TV movie the classifiied info they need? Like they did with the Osama kill movie?
If they do, will you produce verifiable facts that they have?...Or will you continue to blow your assumption and innuendo out of the usual places?
FredHayek wrote: Boxes of classified info was found in the home of Petraeus's lover. The general denies giving it to her. Do they normally let reservists take home secret files?
And you have verifiable proof that the general is lying? Could there possibly be another explanation for how/where the files were obtained?....Or will you continue to blow your assumption and innuendo out of the usual places?
What boxes of classified information? According to reports, her computer had some classified information. Not "boxes". The FBI has said that it has no reason to believe that the information found on her computer came from Petraeus. Broadwell did have a top level security clearance up until this past week, indicating that she had access to classified information on her own. Further, she was acquainted with many other individuals who had access to classified information.
Why let the facts get in the way of a smear campaign against an American patriot.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
Something the Dog Said wrote: What boxes of classified information? According to reports, her computer had some classified information. Not "boxes". The FBI has said that it has no reason to believe that the information found on her computer came from Petraeus. Broadwell did have a top level security clearance up until this past week, indicating that she had access to classified information on her own. Further, she was acquainted with many other individuals who had access to classified information.
Why let the facts get in the way of a smear campaign against an American patriot.
Smear campaign? Too late. The good general already admitted that.
Silly me for the boxes of classified info, Diane Sawyer lied to me. Maybe she was still drunk from election night.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Where was the outrage when Condoleeza Rice was lying about Saddam having a "nuclear weapons program", and we would see the "mushroom clouds", when she knew that the Bushies had already told the CIA what kind of information they should provide? The Geezer says "but, but 4 Americans were killed"...What about the 4,780 Americans, and nearly a million Iraqis that were killed because of Bush's lies?
I'm still waiting for someone to show where the difference is....
LadyJazzer wrote: Where was the outrage when Condoleeza Rice was lying about Saddam having a "nuclear weapons program", and we would see the "mushroom clouds", when she knew that the Bushies had already told the CIA what kind of information they should provide? The Geezer says "but, but 4 Americans were killed"...What about the 4,780 Americans, and nearly a million Iraqis that were killed because of Bush's lies?
I'm still waiting for someone to show where the difference is....
Congress could have investigated but Nancy Pelosi was more concerned with passing out pork.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Congress could have investigated Condoleeza Rice, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld for lying to the American people; war-crimes and being directly responsible for the unnecessary deaths of 4,780 service men and women.
Democrats realize that Congress has far more important work to do than bogging down in witch hunts that more often than not do nothing but waste time and the peoples money.