spineless politicians or soulless immoral Americans?

FredHayek wrote: If the Republicans only help the rich the 1% why did 47% of Americans vote for Mitt?

Marketing? False advertising? And he still lost.

Why did 52% NOT vote for Mitt?

After repeated, proved lies, falsehoods, and spending hundreds-of-millions of dollars, and doing everything possible to suppress the vote, he still couldn't find enough old, angry white guys & Obama-haters to believe the GOTP line....

Big Doug wrote:

FredHayek wrote: But they are the facts. Obama hasn't done anything to change it.

With Dems, it is all about intentions instead of deeds.

lol Two words for you Fred

Stimulus Package

I got your stimulus package right here.....

LadyJazzer wrote:

Big Doug wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Obama already runs the perfect system. The earners and capitalists get to pay only 15 to 20% on their money. And corporations get to keep income earned overseas. Obama, the weak president, has overseen one of the largest increases in wealth disparity in American history. And years of stagnant wages and wealth loss for middle and lower income Americans, especially minorities.

:rofllol Obama and the democrats are responsible for the Rich getting Richer and the Poor getting Poorer... :rofllol And stagnant wages..Bwha ha ha ha ha ha..

Ah...whew...omg...

It's a fantasy-land, ain't it? :

Tell me LadyJazzer, do you feel the current administration has ably advocated for change? The liberals I know are as deeply disappointed in their party's performance as I am in mine. Why do we continue to defend those who betray us time and time again?

LJ typical response: It is still all Bush's fault! She must have been a great employee when she was working blaming everyone instead of actually fixing things the Obama way.

Still trying to run from history, since you can't revise it...

You own it... Enjoy it.

LadyJazzer wrote: Still trying to run from history, since you can't revise it...

You own it... Enjoy it.

I wax nostalgic for the Bush years when people had full time jobs instead of part time work, when unemployment was under 7%. When debt was half of what it is now. When college graduates were getting record signing bonuses instead of barista smocks and huge education loans they can't repay.

I wax nostalgic for the Clinton years when 23.1 million jobs were created and we weren't putting unnecessary, unpaid-for wars and tax-cuts on the credit card.

If you long for the Bush days when jobs were being lost at a rate of 750,000/month and the country went down the tubes in the worst recession since the Great Depression, that says more about your warped political dementia than it does about mine.

But people had work and record amounts of people weren't on food stamps or disability. Obama hands out benefits but sure can't deliver jobs. 7.7% unemployment after four years of Obama. Will we get to go down to 7.5% by 2016? Actually with millions of baby boomers retiring right now, unemployment should be at record lows, but nope, still tens of millions unemployed and underemployed.

No, we can thank the TeaPublicans for the number of people on food stamps... but thanks for playing.

You need some new material, Fred... Your fantasy-land crap doesn't work any more. We're pulling ourselves out of the hole that the teabaggers created, and we're doing it IN SPITE of the teabaggers...not because of anything they are doing now to help.

I'm sooo done with your whining about issues that don't even affect you. When you hit the $400,000/year mark you let me know. Until then, I'm not interested in your Randroid sociopathic hatred.

You clowns lost... You lost with women; Hispanics; blacks; seniors; LGBT; even veterans; and everybody else except angry white guys--and you're running out of them.

God, would you teabagging extremists jus' keep doin' what yer doin'....PLEASE....Now that Obama HAS WON, you can start kissing your off-the-rails party good-bye.