The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: And DOG... what about Petraeus... once again you omit critical points...
In an email at 2:44 p.m. to Chip Walter, head of the CIA’s legislative affairs office, Petraeus expressed frustration at the new, scrubbed talking points, noting that they had been stripped of much of the content his agency had provided. Petraeus noted with evident disappointment that the policymakers had even taken out the line about the CIA’s warning on Cairo. The CIA director, long regarded as a team player, declined to pick a fight with the White House and seemed resigned to the propagation of the administration’s preferred narrative. The final decisions about what to tell the American people rest with the national security staff, he reminded Walter, and not with the CIA.
Nope, my post was 100% accurate:
David H. Petraeus, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, told lawmakers on Friday that classified intelligence reports revealed that the deadly assault on the American diplomatic mission in Libya was a terrorist attack, but that the administration refrained from saying it suspected that the perpetrators of the attack were Al Qaeda affiliates and sympathizers to avoid tipping off the groups.
Mr. Petraeus, who resigned last week after admitting to an extramarital affair, said the names of groups suspected in the attack — including Al Qaeda’s franchise in North Africa and a local Libyan group, Ansar al-Shariah — were removed from the public explanation of the attack immediately after the assault to avoiding alerting the militants that American intelligence and law enforcement agencies were tracking them, lawmakers said.
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: Your side is going down because of this... playing politics with American security... and you condone ever piece of it... what does that say.
Oh that is rich......if anyone is playing politics with American security it's the GOP.....and the American people understand that. Yes, they agree we need to know what happened, and why.......but the witch hunt type atmosphere is turning people against the Republicans, whatever their supposedly noble motives. This may fire up their base, but it won't get them any new voters.
Something the Dog Said wrote: Let's see, who voted to cut the funding for security for the diplomatic corp? I believe it was the Republicans.
Well then Hilary showed poor delegation of her remaining funds, didn't she?
Most good managers do a better job with budget cuts than she did and would send extra security to an unstable nation like Libya.
Sorry Dog, just shows more incompetence in the White House.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: Your side is going down because of this... playing politics with American security... and you condone ever piece of it... what does that say.
Oh that is rich......if anyone is playing politics with American security it's the GOP.....and the American people understand that. Yes, they agree we need to know what happened, and why.......but the witch hunt type atmosphere is turning people against the Republicans, whatever their supposedly noble motives. This may fire up their base, but it won't get them any new voters.
Sure about that? Obama's numbers are below 50% again. Doesn't sound like the American public has great faith in President Barack.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Something the Dog Said wrote: Let's see, who voted to cut the funding for security for the diplomatic corp? I believe it was the Republicans.
Well then Hilary showed poor delegation of her remaining funds, didn't she?
Most good managers do a better job with budget cuts than she did and would send extra security to an unstable nation like Libya.
Sorry Dog, just shows more incompetence in the White House.
Actually the Benghazi mission was a CIA operation, not SOS.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
Something the Dog Said wrote: Hmm, where are the GOP polling numbers? Down below 20%.
It f*chking doesn't matter. This topic is about Obama and Hillary and the Benghazi cover up. Grow up and stop playing "nah.. nah... you did it too!" because it has jack sh*t to do with Benghazi.
Perhaps you should scold Fred since he went off topic. There was no cover up, no evidence of any cover up, and this is just political grandstanding about nonesuch.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
Something the Dog Said wrote: Perhaps you should scold Fred since he went off topic. There was no cover up, no evidence of any cover up, and this is just political grandstanding about nonesuch.
More delusional? The White House wouldn't even have a open press Benghazi conference today. They can't even agree on what they to cover up and what to spin.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
