People Died Obama Lied-Talking Points-12 Revisions

Off the record secret meeting with the press...

White House holds 'deep background' Benghazi briefing
By DYLAN BYERS | 5/10/13 1:54 PM EDT
The White House held a "deep background" briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO.

The meeting was conducted on "deep background," according to White House spokesman Josh Earnest, but sources told POLITICO that the existence of the meeting was "off the record." The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing until mid-afternoon.

The session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 63704.html

Nah... their not covering up anything.

Per WSJ....A Select Committee has been requested...bi-partisan in nature AND will be the ONLY means available for the US political
system to extricate itself from the labyrinth called Beneqhazi....(end of quote).....

Mr Hicks' CREDIBLE testimony has changed the end game...JMO

The explanation for Beneghazi DESERVES the BEST EFFORT elected officials can give it, and the right vehicle is a SELECT COMMITTEE
with SUBPOENA POWERS AND DEPOSITION AUTHORITY. Per WSJ

You (collectively) are all just chasing your tails in such a tight circle that I'm surprised you can still stand up...JMO (translated=your
partisanship is friggin getting stale and stupid....JMO

FredHayek wrote:

archer wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: Your side is going down because of this... playing politics with American security... and you condone ever piece of it... what does that say.

Oh that is rich......if anyone is playing politics with American security it's the GOP.....and the American people understand that. Yes, they agree we need to know what happened, and why.......but the witch hunt type atmosphere is turning people against the Republicans, whatever their supposedly noble motives. This may fire up their base, but it won't get them any new voters.

Sure about that? Obama's numbers are below 50% again. Doesn't sound like the American public has great faith in President Barack.

Obama isn't running for anything/

Oops... when pigs fly... Mother Jones...

Benghazi Isn't Watergate. But the White House Didn't Tell the Full Story.

As ABC News reported on Friday morning, the most discussed talking points in US diplomatic history were revised multiple times before being passed to UN Ambassador Susan Rice prior to her appearances last September on Sunday talk shows. The revisions—which deleted several lines noting that the CIA months before the attack had produced intelligence reports on the threat of Al Qaeda-linked extremists in Benghazi—appear to have been driven by State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland, who, it should be noted, is a career Foggy Bottomer who has served Republican and Democratic administrations, not a political appointee. Her motive seems obvious: fend off a CIA CYA move that could make the State Department look lousy. (The other major deletion concerned three sentences about a possible link between the attack and Ansar al-Sharia, an Al Qaeda-affiliated group; last November, David Petraeus, the former CIA chief, testified that this information was removed from the talking points in order to avoid tipping off the group.)

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/05 ... hite-house

Of course... the rest of the story downplays the significance of all this editing and lies... but what can they do... the're Mother Jones.

archer wrote: Obama isn't running for anything/

But Hillary will be... and this is going to put a big kink in her election efforts.... whee.

homeagain wrote: Per WSJ....A Select Committee has been requested...bi-partisan in nature AND will be the ONLY means available for the US political
system to extricate itself from the labyrinth called Beneqhazi....(end of quote).....

Mr Hicks' CREDIBLE testimony has changed the end game...JMO

The explanation for Beneghazi DESERVES the BEST EFFORT elected officials can give it, and the right vehicle is a SELECT COMMITTEE
with SUBPOENA POWERS AND DEPOSITION AUTHORITY. Per WSJ

You (collectively) are all just chasing your tails in such a tight circle that I'm surprised you can still stand up...JMO (translated=your
partisanship is friggin getting stale and stupid....JMO

First you mention the fact that Mr Hicks' testimony is credible, then you say we're all chasing our tails. Should this whole matter have just been swept under the rug eight months ago, or is there legitimate reason to be concerned that this administration is guilty of changing, or pressuring the CIA to change the talking points? You must agree that the stories eight months ago are not exactly lining up with the new facts and emails that have recently been discovered... right? These people WORK FOR US and not the other way around... we deserve to know all the answers regardless who falls because of them.

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: Per WSJ....A Select Committee has been requested...bi-partisan in nature AND will be the ONLY means available for the US political
system to extricate itself from the labyrinth called Beneqhazi....(end of quote).....

Mr Hicks' CREDIBLE testimony has changed the end game...JMO

The explanation for Beneghazi DESERVES the BEST EFFORT elected officials can give it, and the right vehicle is a SELECT COMMITTEE
with SUBPOENA POWERS AND DEPOSITION AUTHORITY. Per WSJ

You (collectively) are all just chasing your tails in such a tight circle that I'm surprised you can still stand up...JMO (translated=your
partisanship is friggin getting stale and stupid....JMO

First you mention the fact that Mr Hicks' testimony is credible, then you say we're all chasing our tails. Should this whole matter have just been swept under the rug eight months ago, or is there legitimate reason to be concerned that this administration is guilty of changing, or pressuring the CIA to change the talking points? You must agree that the stories eight months ago are not exactly lining up with the new facts and emails that have recently been discovered... right? These people WORK FOR US and not the other way around... we deserve to know all the answers regardless who falls because of them.

WHAT I am saying is this.....THERE IS A PROBLEM......NOW, allow the select committee to delve into this fubar (subpoena the records) and get to the TRUTH.....laying blame is premature at this juncture.

The factors are many and sorting out the information will take TIME....there is much to explain....STARTING WITH THE WSJ
ARTICLE ABOUT THE LACK OF CLARIFICATION OF WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURITY...THE CIA OR THE STATE DEPT.....each
assumed the other was responsible. The issue of Blackwater/contracted security org who pissed off the Libyan government has
compounded this factor....the level of security designation was NOT decided and it is my understanding it was low bidded....you
get what you pay for....the list of factors goes on and on......I'm as pissed as everyone else on this site......but PARTISAN politics
is just a cope out. There needs to be accountability and that will take time to achieve.

archer wrote:

FredHayek wrote:

archer wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: Your side is going down because of this... playing politics with American security... and you condone ever piece of it... what does that say.

Oh that is rich......if anyone is playing politics with American security it's the GOP.....and the American people understand that. Yes, they agree we need to know what happened, and why.......but the witch hunt type atmosphere is turning people against the Republicans, whatever their supposedly noble motives. This may fire up their base, but it won't get them any new voters.

Sure about that? Obama's numbers are below 50% again. Doesn't sound like the American public has great faith in President Barack.

Obama isn't running for anything/

LOL I did not think we would get to # 5 so quickly. :coffee-News:

Blazer Bob wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Fox & CNN are covering it too. MSNBC?

Rhetorical question, right?

Someone should start a poll.

1. It is Bush's fault.

2. Bush did it too.

3. It was so long ago, what does it matter?

4 It is just a partisan witch hunt.

5. It was all Obama's fault and he cannot run again so shut up.

6.___________?

Of course you know that my post was not an answer to your post but to Fred's, why can't you make a point without being dishonest?

homeagain wrote: WHAT I am saying is this.....THERE IS A PROBLEM......NOW, allow the select committee to delve into this fubar (subpoena the records) and get to the TRUTH.....laying blame is premature at this juncture.

The factors are many and sorting out the information will take TIME....there is much to explain....STARTING WITH THE WSJ
ARTICLE ABOUT THE LACK OF CLARIFICATION OF WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURITY...THE CIA OR THE STATE DEPT.....each
assumed the other was responsible. The issue of Blackwater/contracted security org who pissed off the Libyan government has
compounded this factor....the level of security designation was NOT decided and it is my understanding it was low bidded....you
get what you pay for....the list of factors goes on and on......I'm as pissed as everyone else on this site......but PARTISAN politics
is just a cope out. There needs to be accountability and that will take time to achieve.

You mean like Hillarys ARB (Accountability Review Board) that she convened and found nothing... missed those 12 revisions and then she told us "What difference at this point does it make?”... yea... a "select committee" will fix everything. I want what are you smoking?