Common Sense Abortion Laws?

FredHayek wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: And the point is STILL that IT'S NONE OF THE G*DAM* GOVERNMENT'S or ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS to involve themselves in that decision. That's between a woman and her doctor... And the rest can p*ss off...

The world isn't black and white, it is differing shades of grey. So you are fine with a doctor and patient conspiring to kill a fetus, but not fine with the expectant mother doing heroin? The heroin does less harm to the fetus.

Response: Two Legs Bad, Four Legs Good.

What part of "And the point is STILL that IT'S NONE OF THE G*DAM* GOVERNMENT'S or ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS to involve themselves in that decision. That's between a woman and her doctor... And the rest can p*ss off..." did you not understand?

LadyJazzer wrote:

FredHayek wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: And the point is STILL that IT'S NONE OF THE G*DAM* GOVERNMENT'S or ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS to involve themselves in that decision. That's between a woman and her doctor... And the rest can p*ss off...

The world isn't black and white, it is differing shades of grey. So you are fine with a doctor and patient conspiring to kill a fetus, but not fine with the expectant mother doing heroin? The heroin does less harm to the fetus.

Response: Two Legs Bad, Four Legs Good.

What part of "And the point is STILL that IT'S NONE OF THE G*DAM* GOVERNMENT'S or ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS to involve themselves in that decision. That's between a woman and her doctor... And the rest can p*ss off..." did you not understand?

Ireland just legalized abortions this week, so it clearly is the goverment's business according to them.

I don't care about them... They've had religion involved in their governments for centuries... (Which is a great deal of the problem here... I want "YOUR" religion out of MY government.)

(...and before you start, I'm not talking about "YOU" personally...)

What part of "And the point is STILL that IT'S NONE OF THE G*DAM* GOVERNMENT'S or ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS to involve themselves in that decision. That's between a woman and her doctor... And the rest can p*ss off..." did you not understand?

LadyJazzer wrote: What part of "And the point is STILL that IT'S NONE OF THE G*DAM* GOVERNMENT'S or ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS to involve themselves in that decision. That's between a woman and her doctor... And the rest can p*ss off..." did you not understand?

And what part of "Your premise is flawed, which is why your conclusion is also flawed" are you incapable of comprehending?

AUSTIN – The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) today received information that individuals planned to use a variety of items or props to disrupt legislative proceedings at the Texas Capitol.

Therefore for safety purposes, DPS recommended to the Texas Senate that all bags be inspected prior to allowing individuals to enter the Senate gallery, which the Texas Senate authorized.

During these inspections, DPS officers have thus far discovered one jar suspected to contain urine, 18 jars suspected to contain feces, and three bottles suspected to contain paint. All of these items – as well as significant quantities of feminine hygiene products, glitter and confetti possessed by individuals – were required to be discarded; otherwise those individuals were denied entry into the gallery.

In the interest of the safety and security of Texas legislators and the general public, these inspections will continue until the conclusion of Senate business.

http://www.texastribune.org/2013/07/12/ ... rs-climax/

Classy pro-choice people on the loose.

Abortion fights risk worsening GOP's gender gap
Will GOP's new abortion battles backfire?

Republicans may be tirelessly working to rebrand their party since losing last year’s race for the White House, but a recent slew of state initiatives to restrict access to abortion isn't doing this effort any favors – and may only widen the party's so-called "gender gap" in attracting women voters.

Indeed, while conservatives celebrate Texas' early-morning passage of a high-profile bill that bans most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy and places new requirements on which facilities can perform the procedure, liberals are once again railing against the party for its so-called "war on women."

Yet despite the risk of alienating female voters, the campaigns have undoubtedly energized conservatives, particularly opponents of abortion rights who compose a cornerstone of the Republican base. And conservatives argue that polling suggests that most Americans – including most women – favor limiting late-term abortions.

Despite Wendy Davis' dramatic filibuster delaying Texas' abortion bill, the Republican-dominated Texas legislature is expected to support the measure which would ban most abortions for women more than 20 weeks pregnant. Just this year, 17 states passed new measures impacting abortion. NBC's Kate Snow reports.

“Rhetorically, this can be really hard,” said Liz Mair, a Republican strategist. For the efforts to work to their benefit, party leaders need to "figure out what [they're] going to say, and test it out in advance," she said, "and not by talking to committed pro-lifers.”

And how IS that "rebranding" thing workin' out for ya?... :rofllol lol

Certainly helping with the women's vote!... And the Hispanic/Immigration vote!!... And the LGBT Vote!!!... And the Voter-ID/Voter-Suppression (read: black/hispanic) vote!!!!

Jus' keep doin' what yer doin'...


And they were "“Confiscating tampons?" in the Texas Legislature?

If you see a bunch of knuckle-dragging Texas legislators walking around with strings hanging out of their ears, you'll know what happened to them....

There are several things that are very wrong with this.

Killing a baby is murder. So prosecute both mother and doctor.
How's that for common sense?

About what I expected...from the usual people....