Tyranny of the majority

11 Oct 2013 08:45 #21 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Tyranny of the majority

FredHayek wrote: And this is better how?


Well when those poor people get cancers or are involved in terrible car accidents...Me and you don't have to pay thier bills.

You don't understand that part of all of this? The freeloaders have turned a 25 cent aspirin into a $25 aspirin- if everyones insured you'll just be paying my bills, not everyone elses

WEve been talkin about this for 3 years and you don't understand basic stuff like that?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 09:29 #22 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Tyranny of the majority
Since I pay taxes, a lot of taxes, I will have to pay their bills.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 09:43 #23 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Tyranny of the majority

FredHayek wrote: Since I pay taxes, a lot of taxes, I will have to pay their bills.



You really don't get it do you?

The Affordable Care Act lowers costs by making everyone pay for thier own healthcare..Its called personal responsibility which you claim to be all for, unless the corporate, insurance industry sponsered media tells you not to, this time...

Be youre own man Fred


Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 12:56 #24 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Tyranny of the majority
You got it all wrong like usual. It is adding another payline onto your medical costs, you still get to pay for your doctor and your medical insurance, but now you also get to pay for a bunch more bureaucrats, from new IRS agents to new Health & Human service people. And have the goverment subsidize the people who can't afford the new, high priced yet low benefit insurance.
Yippee! Let's expand government even more.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 13:03 #25 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Tyranny of the majority

FredHayek wrote: You got it all wrong like usual. It is adding another payline onto your medical costs, you still get to pay for your doctor and your medical insurance, but now you also get to pay for a bunch more bureaucrats, from new IRS agents to new Health & Human service people. And have the goverment subsidize the people who can't afford the new, high priced yet low benefit insurance.
Yippee! Let's expand government even more.



No, you don't get it...10,000 new government employees equals about 10 seconds in defense spending- Perspective, try to keep things perspective Fred..And I think the average American wants more healthcare and less homeland security. Thats goes for the NSA, DEA, and ATF as well..Complain about those treasury drainers with ZERO ROI..

Do you notice how spending our tax dollars is just fine with you Rightwingnuts unless its spent/invested on us "we the people"? Thats the only time you have a problem with it- So where are you retards getting your marching orders from?

I'm afraid of Cancer, not terrorists

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 14:03 #26 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Tyranny of the majority
I am for spending cuts across the board. We are spending 30% more than we are taking in. The military is 19% of the budget so even if you eliminated it, we would still be in the hole. So the cuts need to be across the board. Everyone gets to feel the pain.
Instead ACA comes out to increase debt obligations.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 14:20 #27 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Tyranny of the majority
Its not just 19% of the budget..ha ha ha...

#Dupedagain

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 14:20 #28 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic Tyranny of the majority

FredHayek wrote: Since I pay taxes, a lot of taxes, I will have to pay their bills.


Boo-friggin'-hoo...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 14:22 #29 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Tyranny of the majority

LadyJazzer wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Since I pay taxes, a lot of taxes, I will have to pay their bills.


Boo-friggin'-hoo...



Yeah, you can always leave Fred...Go to Somalia...Very low taxes and no infrastructure or adequate healthcare there..

Its every man for himself, a right wing paradise!

#BigTalker

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2013 14:35 #30 by PrintSmith
Replied by PrintSmith on topic Tyranny of the majority

Big Dougy wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Since I pay taxes, a lot of taxes, I will have to pay their bills.



You really don't get it do you?

The Affordable Care Act lowers costs by making everyone pay for thier own healthcare..Its called personal responsibility which you claim to be all for, unless the corporate, insurance industry sponsered media tells you not to, this time...

Be youre own man Fred

Oh really now. If you can't afford health insurance now, how are you magically going to be able to afford it unless someone else is paying the bill for you? When I was a young lad, I paid for all of my health care out of my own pocket. I paid the doctors, I paid the X-ray technicians, I paid the lab bills, I paid for the materials used to suture my hand shut, I paid for any prescriptions that were written - all of it without paying an insurance company a single dime. So why do Democrats want to force the young people today to subsidize their own costs? Isn't that what the (un)Affordable Care Act is really designed to do? The young people, by and large, are not the ones who need insurance, it's the old fogies like you and I that actually need it. What the Democrats have done, yet again, is vote themselves a benefit at the expense of the young people. While I may indeed see a lower premium because the law cost shifts the cost of my care onto young people and young families, those young people are not going to be seeing their premiums lowered. Did you happen to see this from Forbes?

Double Down: Obamacare Will Increase Avg. Individual-Market Insurance Premiums By 99% For Men, 62% For Women
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... for-women/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.143 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+