Tyranny of the majority

The study is 13 years old, anything more current? And posting a rehashed HuffingPoop article that doesn't show the 2000 date doesn't count linktard.

Big Dougy wrote:

PrintSmith wrote:

Big Dougy wrote:

FredHayek wrote: PS,
VL & LJ are such good Kool-Aid drinkers, they were told ACA was good so they fell for it and damn the actual facts.

I think it's going to be better, because


We all know what we got now is bad, the worst in the world...We pay more and get less

Fred, you fight so hard to continue to get fleeced- lol

Could anything be more sensless????

Not true at all Big Doughy. We have the best health care system out there in exchange for spending more per capita for it than the socialized countries do.

No we don't..We spend way more per person than ANY other country on earth and are ranked 37th..Were getting F-ed...By any measure


Rank Country

1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
21 Belgium
22 Colombia
23 Sweden
24 Cyprus
25 Germany
26 Saudi Arabia
27 United Arab Emirates
28 Israel
29 Morocco
30 Canada
31 Finland
32 Australia
33 Chile
34 Denmark
35 Dominica
36 Costa Rica
37 United States of America

http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

Right so instead of trying what other countries have shown to lower costs, we simply have mandated that everyone spend money with insurance companies.

You see other countries measure health by things like free time and lifespan. We measure it by insurance company profits and hits on the ACA site.

We have started this process without even using the right measurements.

Too bad those that pushed for the ACA put off the universal care concept for decades.

Since we are already broke as a nation (as I pointed out most posters here have more resources and money than our nation), this could make universal care only possible under the next country that takes over after the US fails because of a lack of money and citizen support.

I think this is where you or LJ typically put a little yellow guy laughing. Laughing about the damage that is being done.

Is anyone up for a test in time. I know this is like rape in politics, but why not simply make a law saying that if the ACA does not make us healthier by some great measurement in say 10 years we will stop it. Like the anti-bullying programs, if they don't work, we should have something in place to stop them or all that is left is the name and the stupid people that cannot look past it.

archer wrote: I guess to that small minority out on the far right fringe, the rest of the people in this country would look like radicals. That is a pretty warped view of reality deltamrey, but not unexpected. Like I posted in another thread, that kind of arrogance will destroy the republican party.

How many times have you predicted the death of the Republican Party? And how many times has it died? In the last election, the "war on women" GOP kept their seats in the House.
lol You have really been listening to the press too long. There are a lot of people who like that the GOP is taking on ACA who the majority of Americans no longer want. The more they find out about it, the more they dislike it.

on that note wrote: Since we are already broke as a nation

FF to around 13 into minutes of my signature video..Theres a few of people with money in America..The 1%'rs

on that note wrote:
this could make universal care only possible under the next country that takes over after the US fails because of a lack of money and citizen support.

lol You think someones gonna take over America because if this! :rofllol

After out spending the rest of the world combined on defense every year for the last 40 years, and youre still afraid OTN!?

America, home of the cowards