...And the numbers continue to drop...

23 Oct 2013 21:25 #21 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic ...And the numbers continue to drop...

WindPeak wrote: :like: And Obama and the Dems booboos just keep piling on.

OmniScience wrote:

Walter L Newton wrote: Before you fix the website you have to fix the stupid that was responsible for this fustercluck. Hmmmm... I wonder who was in charge of this?



BUSH !

Responsibility? Accountability? From this administration?

IRS, Benghazi, F & F, NSA Spying, AP wiretaps, Obamacare, Solyndra et al. The list continues to grow.

Has ANYONE been found responsible for ANY of these events?



Solyndra? :rofllol

Let me see, two unfunded 4 trillion dollar wars with over a million innocent civilians killed, or a failed wind or solar (i don't even know) project?

Wow- The idiocy here is unreal

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 06:49 #22 by PrintSmith
Lest we forget:

IN the unlit blackness of an October night, it took a flashlight to pick them out: rust-colored butchers' hooks, 20 or more, each four or five feet long, aligned in rows along the ceiling of a large hangar-like building. In the grimmest fortress in Iraq's gulag, on the desert floor 20 miles west of Baghdad, this appeared to be the grimmest corner of all, the place of mass hangings that have been a documented part of life under Saddam Hussein.

At one end of the building at Abu Ghraib prison, a whipping wind gusted through open doors. At the far end, the flashlight picked out a windowed space that appeared to function as a control room. Baggy trousers of the kind worn by many Iraqi men were scattered at the edges of the concrete floor. Some were soiled, as if worn in the last, humiliating moments of a condemned man's life.

<snip>

In the end, if an American-led invasion ousts Mr. Hussein, and especially if an attack is launched without convincing proof that Iraq is still harboring forbidden arms, history may judge that the stronger case was the one that needed no inspectors to confirm: that Saddam Hussein, in his 23 years in power, plunged this country into a bloodbath of medieval proportions, and exported some of that terror to his neighbors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/26/weeki ... all&src=pm


Now, for partisan reasons today the left may like to forget the arguments, like this one, they made in favor of our incursion into Iraq, but the attempts to rewrite history only succeed in their own echo chambers. President Bush had not only the support of the majority of the populace, but the support of the majority of both houses of Congress, and their explicit permission, to use the Union's armed forces for that purpose, prior to the invasion of Iraq. 40% of the Democrats in the House (82) and 58% of the Democrats in the Senate (29) voted in favor of the Iraq Resolution. The ACA, on the other hand, has only ever had the approval of one political party. It has never been favored by a majority of the populace, nor has it ever had bi-partian support in both houses of Congress. Even today the number of the States' citizens who strongly oppose the law outnumber those who strongly support it 2 to 1.

You can attempt to rewrite history all you want Doughy, but you'll have to wait until those who lived through it are all dead before you have a prayer of succeeding in that endeavor.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 07:13 #23 by FredHayek
VL is so far to the left, he thinks Bill & Hillary Clinton who supported the Iraq invasion are Republicans.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 10:34 #24 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic ...And the numbers continue to drop...

FredHayek wrote: VL is so far to the left, he thinks Bill & Hillary Clinton who supported the Iraq invasion are Republicans.


Bill Clinton was the best republican president we ever had...

#NAFTA

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 11:00 #25 by Rick

Big Dougy wrote:

WindPeak wrote: :like: And Obama and the Dems booboos just keep piling on.

OmniScience wrote:

Walter L Newton wrote: Before you fix the website you have to fix the stupid that was responsible for this fustercluck. Hmmmm... I wonder who was in charge of this?



BUSH !

Responsibility? Accountability? From this administration?

IRS, Benghazi, F & F, NSA Spying, AP wiretaps, Obamacare, Solyndra et al. The list continues to grow.

Has ANYONE been found responsible for ANY of these events?



Let me see, two unfunded 4 trillion dollar wars with over a million innocent civilians killed,

Do you have a source for these BS "facts"?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 11:59 #26 by OmniScience

Big Dougy wrote: Wow- The idiocy here is unreal


This coming from someone who was overcome by "stingray venom".

Keep posting, I'll keep laughing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 15:01 #27 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic ...And the numbers continue to drop...

Rick wrote:

Big Dougy wrote:

WindPeak wrote: :like: And Obama and the Dems booboos just keep piling on.

OmniScience wrote:

Walter L Newton wrote: Before you fix the website you have to fix the stupid that was responsible for this fustercluck. Hmmmm... I wonder who was in charge of this?



BUSH !

Responsibility? Accountability? From this administration?

IRS, Benghazi, F & F, NSA Spying, AP wiretaps, Obamacare, Solyndra et al. The list continues to grow.

Has ANYONE been found responsible for ANY of these events?



Let me see, two unfunded 4 trillion dollar wars with over a million innocent civilians killed,

Do you have a source for these BS "facts"?


Sure


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORB_survey ... casualties

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013 ... r-veterans

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 15:07 #28 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic ...And the numbers continue to drop...

OmniScience wrote:

Big Dougy wrote: Wow- The idiocy here is unreal


This coming from someone who was overcome by "stingray venom".

Keep posting, I'll keep laughing.


I was so overcome I walked a mile, then let my wife blow me before administering the antidote...

btw-Hot water is the antidote friends, real hot water- It coagulates the toxins- Instant relief- Whatever you do, don't pour cold beer on the wound,.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 17:48 #29 by LadyJazzer

WindPeak wrote: :like: And Obama and the Dems booboos just keep piling on.

OmniScience wrote:

Walter L Newton wrote: Before you fix the website you have to fix the stupid that was responsible for this fustercluck. Hmmmm... I wonder who was in charge of this?



BUSH !

Responsibility? Accountability? From this administration?

IRS, Benghazi, F & F, NSA Spying, AP wiretaps, Obamacare, Solyndra et al. The list continues to grow.

Has ANYONE been found responsible for ANY of these events?


Yeah, I've been meaning to ask....

* How'd that "IRS" thing turn out for ya? Get any traction other than the source-free, fact-free echo-chamber?

* How'd that Benghazi thing turn out for ya? Get any traction other than the source-free, fact-free echo-chamber?

* How'd that F&F thing turn out for ya? Get any traction other than the source-free, fact-free echo-chamber?

* How'd that Solyndra thing turn out for ya? Get any traction other than the source-free, fact-free echo-chamber?

* How'd that AP thing turn out for ya? Get any traction other than the source-free, fact-free echo-chamber?

NSA Spying is yours as much as Obama's... Congratulations... People will remember who gave the order to tap into the AT&T backbone net... "Room 641A is a telecommunication interception facility operated by AT&T for the U.S. National Security Agency that commenced operations in 2003 and was exposed in 2006." Hmmmm, who was president in 2003-2006? Am I P.O.'d that it's been enhanced rather than terminated? You betcha...

ObamaCare.... YES!!! Bring it on...

By the way, how'd that "defund/kill/repeal ObamaCare" "Shutdown the Government" thing turn out for ya?

Oh yeah, a GOTP DISAPPROVAL RATING of 76%

P*ssed away $26 BILLION DOLLARS ...FOR NOTHING....

PLEASE...Jus' keep doin' what yer doin'...

Don't count on controlling the House...It's not a sure-thing... But I'll guarantee you I won't live to see another teabagger/GOTP president in the White House...

:woo hoo: :biggrin: :rofllol lol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Oct 2013 18:09 #30 by Blazer Bob
It is not about political traction. It is about integrity and competence. Why shouldn't that matter when it has a democratic brand?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.161 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+