- Posts: 605
- Thank you received: 0
navycpo7 wrote:
ColoradoXprss wrote: repsonding to navycop7:
I STATED I WAS GOING TO RESEARCH IT.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
ColoradoXprss wrote: Please check the links below and then explain to me how Fred Wegener received the number of votes that have been published by the Park County Clerks Office as a "WIN". The numbers DO NOT ADD UP!! Next steps..thoughts!!
Contact the local media outlets, newspaper and television. Contact the Colorado Secretary of State and the Attorney Generals Office.
http://www.elections.colorado.gov/Defau ... enuID=1466
Once at the website above click on the "all reports- June Excel, click on the Congressional District tab then scroll down to Park County (line 79)".
According to the Colorado State information as of 3:06am on 7/1/10; the active republican registered voters for Park County was 1,963 with 209 inactive registered republicans; total 2,172.
Now go to the Park County 2010 Primary Election - Unofficial Results
http://www.parkco.us/index.aspx?NID=273
click on the 2010 Unofficial Primary Election Results once on the above link. The count for Fred Wegener 1,526 and Michael Graves 738 which makes a total of 2,264 total ballots cast. Here's the problem folks; the numbers DO NOT ADD UP, 2,264 ballots cast ONLY 1,963 active registered republicans in Park County. So where did the additional 401 votes come from?? Even if you add the inactive republican registered voters (348) the numbers STILL don't add up.
This was a PRIMARY election whereas only Republicans COULD VOTE!!!!!! I am of the firm belief that there was ballot tampering, plain and simple.
Thank you for reading.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
PrintSmith wrote: Oh lighten up Xprss. It's pretty clear that you didn't stop to think about the number of people that might have either changed affiliations or picked an affiliation in order to have the ability to have their say in picking our next Sheriff in the Republican Primary before you went of half baked with your allegations of vote fraud. There were also many provisional ballots cast by people who showed up to register an affiliation and vote on election day whose signatures would have to be verified within 48 hours (IIRC) of the closing of the polls before their ballots were tallied into the total.
Perhaps, if you don't enjoy being the butt of jokes after exhibiting foolish behavior you should play the fool a little less often. If you do your research before you hit the send button, instead of starting it after your premise has been poked full of more holes than an air mattress that a porcupine slept on, perhaps, just perhaps mind you, folks might be willing to presume that your argument has some merit instead of dismissing it outright.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
mtntrekker wrote:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
ColoradoXprss wrote: Thank you for pointing this out to me Navyco7...I did only see the one line item for Park with CD6 at 1,963 active republicans registered. I was unaware of the other line which had Park CD5 on it.
Agree with you that there were numerous folks who did not turn out to vote. Don't agree that Fred won on "honest ballot counting". Before anyone goes spouting off about its done and over with, its not over...with the information that has been coming to light by various concerned citizens, I have serious concerns on the individual precinct number counts.
With the turnouts that I witnessed on Meet the Greets and Debates Michael Graves' loss by that wide of a margin is not phathomable. JUST MY OPINION!!!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
A bit over the line, perhaps, but I wouldn't say uncalled for. CX didn't have a concern so much as a conclusion cemented in their brain before they started looking. The first post by CX, and the accompanying title for the thread, clearly evidences this.mtntrekker wrote: uncalled for printsmith. at least xprsss looked at the figures and brought forth what she found and her concern.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.