Defend the policies you'll be voting for, not the man.

FredHayek wrote:

homeagain wrote: www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/cana...elf-collapses-rcna71

And U don't think sea levels will rise SOONER than predicted?

President Obama has better intel than us and he doesn't think sea levels will rise, he bought a mansion on the beach in the Hamptons.

HIS decision, his error....NEW ORLEANS will be the first fatality (BELOW sea level is not a good position to be in)

Again, no specific answers so I assume just throwing money at a leftist run government and hoping they know what they are doing is the best option, right?

As for sea levels rising, shouldn't Obama's place already be under water if we were to believe the brain dead hypocrite Al Gore?

homeagain wrote: www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/cana...elf-collapses-rcna71

And U don't think sea levels will rise SOONER than predicted?

IT JUST OCCURRED, RICK......read the link...the MASSIVE ice shelf broke at the end of JULY.....It is now
floating like a continent and the prevailing currents will come into play.

Do you have done evidence that this will influence sea levels?

THIS isn't calving ice, it is completely broken shelf....that has been happening regularly for the last two years...or so....this is the LAST of them...calving is a natural occurrence. COMPLETE breakage of a
shelf is climate change....I''m sure in the days and weeks to come and analysis will be available of the
impact...I am not a scientist. BUT, I have lived in Alaska and KNOW that Alaska is warmer and wetter
than before.

When water freezes, it expands. When ice melts it doesn't expand. The oceans haven't risen and taken out Florida and won't. The vikings didn't bore through the ice to build villages on northern islands. The world has gone through this before and its happening again. The Left's current crisis, climate change, wasn't caused by mankind. Before climate change was global warming, before that was global cooling, etc. They should all fall under global BS.

www.conservation.org/stories/11-climate-...qEAAYBCAAEgKIOPD_BwE

140 billion per year for US.... .2 percent of GDP....cost to rectify/mitigate climate change....THAT IS
POINT 2 PERCENT....not 2 percent....STOP DEFORESTATION and u decrease the amount of $$$
required... not difficult to do, just deciding it is worth it...FOR YOUR CHILDREN,GRANDCHILDREN

homeagain wrote: www.conservation.org/stories/11-climate-...qEAAYBCAAEgKIOPD_BwE

140 billion per year for US.... .2 percent of GDP....cost to rectify/mitigate climate change....THAT IS
POINT 2 PERCENT....not 2 percent....STOP DEFORESTATION and u decrease the amount of $$$
required... not difficult to do, just deciding it is worth it...FOR YOUR CHILDREN,GRANDCHILDREN

Looks like you defend flawed policies. The forests are larger, but with smaller trees, than before. Since plant life uses carbon dioxide and releases oxygen that is good. The deforestation is occurring in Central and South America, but he isn't a king, so no real control over that. Many people see a need to feed their families as more important than untouched forests.

www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/21349...ng-america-electrify

Don't know of this EXTENSIVE link is allowed? BUT, IF u think out of the box ...2035 REDO can be achieved.

Sometimes scientists are wrong? In Norway, the glaciers melted. Millions of tons of ice ran to the ocean in the last thirty years, the result? The land actually rose because the weight of the ice was lost. Beaches became longer.