koobookie wrote: Way to show the diversity of the nation, Trump Party!
While the DNC roll call showcased the diversity of America and made a point of featuring Indigenous people, Black and Hispanic Americans, activists, and LGBTQ people, the RNC roll call was a procession dominated by older white men, all in front of a white background emblazoned with #RNC2020.
Senator Scott was a speaker for the first night, African American. Nikki Haley, Indian-American, also spoke. She got more time than AOC did at the DNC. There were also a Black politician who had given up on the Democrats last night. So it wasn't lily white like the media would have you believe. K, you really need to do your own research. The leftist media likes to selectively edit the news to push their agenda.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: Senator Scott was a speaker for the first night, African American. Nikki Haley, Indian-American, also spoke. She got more time than AOC did at the DNC. There were also a Black politician who had given up on the Democrats last night. So it wasn't lily white like the media would have you believe. K, you really need to do your own research. The leftist media likes to selectively edit the news to push their agenda.
Nikki Haley, who is Indian-American, a couple of seconds after saying, "In much of the Democratic party, it’s now fashionable to say that America is racist. That is a lie. America is not a racist country," she talked about she and her family "faced discrimination and hardship." Yeah, because of the racism.
koobookie wrote: A question for the conservatives on this forum:
Are you comfortable with Trump using the White House as a campaign backdrop in violation of the Hatch Act?
From Wikipedia.
Hatch Act of 1939
The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision prohibits all employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and vice president, from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico. It was most recently amended in 2012.Wikipedia
Yes, Does the Left through out all understanding of words to try to find anything wrong with the standing President?
koobookie wrote: A question for the conservatives on this forum:
Are you comfortable with Trump using the White House as a campaign backdrop in violation of the Hatch Act?
From Wikipedia.
Hatch Act of 1939
The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision prohibits all employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and vice president, from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico. It was most recently amended in 2012.Wikipedia
Yes, Does the Left through out all understanding of words to try to find anything wrong with the standing President?
You do realize that all the employees of the Executive Branch broke the law when they participated in the convention being broadcast from the White House?
I am stunned that many conservatives do not see this as a violation.
