Hunter Biden Matters, a LOT

From the article,it seems his"art" is NOT "all that"....perhaps his price point should be adjusted and at
auction sale,DONATE PROCEEDS to rehab/addiction centers. WHEN he can command higher prices,
and his TALENT is recognized....THEN perhaps his "following/.name" would not be such a glaring
problem. JMO

Wayne Harrison wrote: If you stay up to date on stuff, as I suspect, you already know the terms of the sale.

www.washingtonpost.com/politics/deal-of-...30dcf9363_story.html

LOL, instead of full disclosure, Team Biden insists on full anonymity! I think it would be more helpful if America knew the buyers, the prices, and their connections to the Biden family. Hopefully Wikileaks will find out the truth.

Keep tilting at windmills.

Wayne, you are right. It is just tilting at windmills to expect Biden's DOJ to find anything wrong with these highly suspicious art sales. Senator Biden kept Hunter from getting a dishonorable discharge. And having a powerful father probably helped Hunter stay out of prison on drug charges.

FredHayek wrote: Senator Biden kept Hunter from getting a dishonorable discharge. And having a powerful father probably helped Hunter stay out of prison on drug charges.

FALSE: Hunter Biden’s discharge was administrative, which is standard procedure for failed drug tests, rather than dishonorable.

I feel like some very bad emails are going to see the light pretty soon… “wait for it”

koobookie wrote: You do know that it is not definitely known whether the laptop or the hard drive ever belonged to Hunter Biden, don't you?

You still out there koobookie?

Now that Joe Biden’s president, the Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real

For those of you who don't think that was a huge story that would have changed the mind of many on the fence, you have to be kidding me.

First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden’s business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.

“People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”

All your leftist sources have been proven to be garbage, as I've always said.

In the heat of the presidential race of 2020, the Times never missed a chance to cast doubt on the laptop, saying the information was “purported” and quoting a letter from former Democratic officials who claimed — with no evidence — that it was Russian disinformation. As recently as September 2021, the Times called the laptop “unsubstantiated” in a news story.

Why was it unsubstantiated? Because of willful ignorance and the Times’ curious lack of curiosity. Hunter’s business partner Tony Bobulinski came forward immediately after The Post’s reports and confirmed that the emails bearing his name were legitimate. The Bidens didn’t even deny it was true! They just deflected, with the media’s help, saying it was a dirty trick or not a story. Mostly, the press just ignored it.

I'd much be proven wrong over and over again than have a corrupt news media that has more power to influence an election than Putin or any other foreign scumbag.

nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-...dens-laptop-is-real/

The word in DC is that the NY Times came clean on this story so that Biden couldn't run again. And they don't want Kamala running in 2024 either. So who will be the nominees? Hillary? Warren? Knoblacher? Michelle Obama?

Isn’t the main story about how the media tilted the scales before a presidential election? Yes, yes it is. The same people who wailed about Russian collusion were the same people who knew this story would sink Biden so they all ignored the story and big tech even banned it from their platforms. I don’t ever want to hear about someone’s source being credible again because 95% of them are corrupt pawns of the deep state.

To paraphrase Harry Reid when caught in a lie regarding Romney's tax returns, "Well, we won didn't we".