annnnnddd - there it is.

Exactly. Thank you GeorgeM.

If your focus is on slamming the "woke" policy of gender fluid bathrooms rather than a boy who broke the law and violated 2 girls, or a Superintendent who seemingly lied about this (because that's never happened before in any other situations that don't involve cross-dressing, trans students, etc) then there is something wrong with you.

I'm thoroughly disgusted. The problem isn't that the boy cross-dressed, it's that he assaulted 2 girls. Girls and women get raped every day at work, at home, at school by people who claim to love them, by boyfriends and bosses and husbands, and you're outraged by this one situation because it involves a political situation you don't agree with? I don't give a shit if boys who feel they are biological females want to use the girls restroom. There will be very few boys who try to fake that just to get access to girls in that space and that's not the problem.

The problem is a group of adults who are supposed to look out for our kids don't take seriously enough a girl's report of an assault when she makes it so that this POS boy had the opportunity to do it again. That kind of behavior has little to do with being "woke" and everything to do with the marginalization of rape as a crime in our society yet again. #MeToo would never had been a movement if it wasn't for that. Fix societal attitudes that "boys always have to push and girls say no" and the lack of severe punishment for rape and maybe this kind of shit will stop happening.

Oh, and the problem is The Daily Wire for misrepresenting what happened to turn on the outrage clickbait machine for suckers who buy this story hook, line, and sinker without looking into it further.

Loudoun County sheriff responds to 'misinformation' surrounding alleged sexual assaults in schools
by Elizabeth Faddis, Breaking News Reporter, Washington Examiner | October 13, 2021 11:37 PM

Police Logs Contradict Some Of The Daily Wire's Reporting On The Loudoun County Rape Scandal
BlockedandReported.org | October 19l, 2021

During our show, I passed this storyline along fairly credulously. But I also mentioned that it was perhaps the easiest part of this whole controversy to independently verify, and that I was going to try to do so by getting hold of the Loudon County Sheriff’s Office dispatch logs associated with the incident, which would either show police there were alerted about a sexual assault (in which case The Daily Wire’s account would be inaccurate) or they were alerted about an irate parent (in which case it would be accurate).

Yesterday I got those logs, and they very strongly dispute Smith’s — and The Daily Wire’s — account.

Did you read the 2^nd link I posted? They didn't say that The Daily Wire said the police covered it up, they said the Daily Wire tried to claim that the school/SRO were only handling "in-house", without involving a full police report or notifying the police of the assault.

As for The Daily Wire’s response, hoo boy. I first DMed Rosiak this morning at about 10:00 a.m. He didn’t get those DMs (I could tell because the second of the two sent-received checkmarks didn’t show up), so I called him at 12:33 p.m. to explain what I was working on and give him a chance to respond. He eventually referred me to a spokesman for The Daily Wire.

It was only as I was putting my finishing touches on this post that I noticed that The Daily Wire and Rosiak raced up an article claiming the logs support his initial reporting. That article doesn’t mention how he got the logs (from me), which is slightly annoying given that Rosiak doesn’t like it when reporters don’t credit other reporters for their work:

I find this disingenuous on two fronts. First, The Daily Wire is attempting to retroactively shift the meaning of “in house,” as though the average reader wouldn’t interpret it as an accusation that the school didn’t seek to involve the police in a timely manner. Scroll back up to that excerpt and read it again and find me any mention of the police being notified — there isn’t one. If Rosiak meant to communicate to readers something like The police were called, but Smith was concerned that they weren’t going to bring on board rape investigators, he would have written just that. That still would have been bad, of course, but it would have been an order of magnitude less explosive than the storyline The Daily Wire initially communicated.

Second, The Daily Wire’s question about “why a team of outside police officers was apparently called to handle an ‘upset parent,’ but not an alleged rape of a student” ignores the fact that a grand total of 50 minutes or so appears to have elapsed between the alleged rape being called in to the LCSO and Smith’s arrival on scene. It appears the SRO had just started his or her investigation, and no one else had arrived yet, but there’s no evidence that the plan was for the SRO to handle the whole thing him- or herself. All we have from the logs is “INVESTIGATING AT THIS TIME,” which implies the process had only just started. Think about how long it would take just to, for example, separate both kids and get both sides of the story and establish exactly what further police services were needed?