"Green" Energy Will Kill Millions of People

On a related note, did you hear about all the people in the metro area losing control of their thermostats?

Good post Bob… we’ve barely started with this insanity and already we are seeing the consequences. These people are not smart enough to convert our energy, especially when there is no viable alternative they are willing to use (like nuclear). How hot or how cold will the alarmists have to get before they wake up?

Of course the politicians who travel on heir private jets will never have to venture out of their 72 degree mansions protected by walls that don’t work.

And on one more related note, people in Poland have been in line for days waiting to fill their cars with coal so they don’t freeze to death this winter.

I’ve said before that when this green energy crap goes too far people will resort to burning their furniture to keep warm. As Joe would say, “no joke, not hyperbole “. Welcome to the new world you asked for.

Rick wrote: Is there anyone here that’s ready to dispute the claim I made about the green energy push (forced conversion), that will kill millions and likely billions of people if the climate alarmists continue to force out reliable energy (fossil fuels)?

SC, I’d love your take on this.

I'm just gonna pop in here and give you a single response -

Why should SC engage you in a conversation when you ignore the thoughts and evidence she posts? Why do you think she owes you a response when you say things like "climate alarmists?"

She's already, months and years ago, responded to your generalities. She's started entire threads about climate change. If you are serious about wanting to engage in a conversation, then be nice and respectful. Go back and read what she's previously written. It's all there. Geeez.

How about giving me your opinion on the topic instead of providing some kind of cover for someone else. You always say you can’t debate me for reasons I still can’t understand, yet you always pop in with a weak jab.

The floor is yours… tell me why I’m wrong about this topic. If I respond in an uncivil way, there’s no doubt where my comments will end up being sent to.

You challenged SC, Rick. I'm merely telling you that your ignorance of what she has already posted is the reason she - and myself - don't post much here anymore.

I’m sure SC appreciates your support, but I guarantee she doesn’t need it.

Could you point me to the points SC has made that refutes my claim that forced “green” energy will kill millions of people?

If I’m wrong, surely you have your own opinion and don’t have to stand behind SC… I just find it a little strange that this is the tactic you choose as a grown adult who has a grasp on current events. You could also find some article to speak for you, but again, that’s the same tactic that gives you a way out of giving your opinion.

There is no article that can prove or disprove my assertions. This requires individuals to look at all the facts and come up with an opinion based on those facts. All I’m asking for is an opinion based on what we know about the viability of energy not derived from fossil fuels.

If you don’t have an opinion you’re willing to share, then I guess I’ll just have to wait for the next time you drop in to call me ignorant and then run away.

koobookie wrote: You challenged SC, Rick. I'm merely telling you that your ignorance of what she has already posted is the reason she - and myself - don't post much here anymore.

YES,I KNOW it is like beating your forehead against a rock (it feels so good when u stop)....BUT, if the venue is only a one way conversation then THIS SITE suffers,U remember VL.......he could sky rocket the views and push traffic...he admitted he was adroit at that....UNTIL his vanity vanquished him.

I just view it as a challenge..kinda like chess. What move (post) BLOCKS the player?

No, Rick. Look it up yourself. You can use the search function here just as well as I can. Do your due diligence and research what she has said.

Gawd, you are so frustrating. On the one hand, you want to have a "discussion." On the other hand, you insult entire groups of people with your generalities. Then you won't even read or respond to thoughtful posts by SC.

You know what, I'm out for a while. Again. Have fun here, Rick.

koobookie wrote: No, Rick. Look it up yourself. You can use the search function here just as well as I can. Do your due diligence and research what she has said.

Gawd, you are so frustrating. On the one hand, you want to have a "discussion." On the other hand, you insult entire groups of people with your generalities. Then you won't even read or respond to thoughtful posts by SC.

You know what, I'm out for a while. Again. Have fun here, Rick.

You are the master at avoiding a conversation. All you have to do is list all my flaws then run for the hills.

I was really hoping that at least one of you would tell me I’m wrong on THIS topic. We have never talked about how many lives the “green” conversion is going to kill. Tell you what Koobookie, if you really do know that SC addressed my topic in a thread I was part of, I will give MMT a break for 6 months.

Now, show me the money or run for the hills.

And yes, SC can also show me the evidence I’m looking for. You too , HA, you of all people would know since you are very active here.

Part of me hopes you find something I completely forgot, but you won’t.