- Posts: 2841
- Thank you received: 92
Perhaps Trump and Vance shouldn't lie so often. Have you ever consiered that?Rick wrote: As for “fact” checking, I’ve never seen any debates, other than ones hosted by the left wing media, in which the moderators inject themselves into the debate and only fact check one side. During the Trump Vs Harris debate, she told a lot of lies and was never fact checked.
I don't think Vance did himself any favors, especially when he whined about being fact checked. What were the moderators supposed to do, just let him lie?Rick wrote: Vance did a great job, regardless. I don’t think anything changes other than erasing the media’s false description of Vance. I don’t think Walz helped their ticket at all, especially after the obvious floundering about the China lie. Vance on the other hand did help Trump imo.
Agreed, none of this will matter because people can see for themselves what charlatans Trump and Vance are.Rick wrote: None of this will matter though, I think the election comes down to how people feel about the last 4 years. Those who hate Trump at a high level will vote for more of the same, no matter how bad our economy and crime get.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote: When your fact checkers are super liberals, they aren't fact checkers. They believe their own set of facts.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
koobookie wrote:
FredHayek wrote: When your fact checkers are super liberals, they aren't fact checkers. They believe their own set of facts.
When you have no argument, you blame the other side of bias.
It's just your opinion that they are super librul, Fred. Trump & Vance agreed to the debate, agreed to the moderators, the time, the setup, etc. Now that Vance has been caught in numerous lies during the debate, he - and you - are claiming that fact checking is unfair?
Fact check for yourself the Vance claims from the debate. I double dog dare you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
driver8 wrote:
koobookie wrote:
FredHayek wrote: When your fact checkers are super liberals, they aren't fact checkers. They believe their own set of facts.
When you have no argument, you blame the other side of bias.
It's just your opinion that they are super librul, Fred. Trump & Vance agreed to the debate, agreed to the moderators, the time, the setup, etc. Now that Vance has been caught in numerous lies during the debate, he - and you - are claiming that fact checking is unfair?
Fact check for yourself the Vance claims from the debate. I double dog dare you.
Fred and Rick are what my family call (and laughs about) arrogant ignorants... arrogant about their ignorance. They use ignorant claim after ignorant claim , with no evidence, with a level of confidence of a 5 year just caught lying and deny that they did. They don't seem to know how to even engage in truthful discussions anymore. They are so committed to the full scope of the MAGA lies they no longer can distinguish reality from truth. "The fact checkers are super librul'... is such a weak and cowardly cop out... but when you are this committed to the lies... you have nothing else. It's like they are being emasculated by their inability to let go of the lies and BS.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.