The state government is the only entity that can address the funding problems with the schools.
It is the proper thing to do - shift the money away from property taxes to the state and let them hash it out. At that point they either find a way to fund it - or the state has to make cuts.
That's $11,935.59 to educate each and every student - per year.
Do you see anything wrong here? Most state colleges do not charge that kind of money!
Taxes for Jeffco schools are the largest portion of our property taxes - they amount to just about 50% of all the property taxes we pay.
If we are to make our local government accountable - the schools out of control budget needs to be on the table. If you vote no on 60 - you just blew the only chance we've had in 18 years to do somthing about it.
LJ is the crew manager at McDonalds, and on 2nd shift, works with a bunch of teenagers..s/he can't handle them..maybe s/he should be a greeter at Wal-mart..nope s/he can't do that either, s/he has no personality whatsoever..
outdoor338 wrote: LJ is the crew manager at McDonalds, and on 2nd shift, works with a bunch of teenagers..s/he can't handle them..maybe s/he should be a greeter at Wal-mart..nope s/he can't do that either, s/he has no personality whatsoever..
I didn't know there is a McDonalds at the fed center.
BearMtnHIB wrote: The state government is the only entity that can address the funding problems with the schools.
It is the proper thing to do - shift the money away from property taxes to the state and let them hash it out. At that point they either find a way to fund it - or the state has to make cuts.
That's $11,935.59 to educate each and every student - per year.
Do you see anything wrong here? Most state colleges do not charge that kind of money!
Taxes for Jeffco schools are the largest portion of our property taxes - they amount to just about 50% of all the property taxes we pay.
If we are to make our local government accountable - the schools out of control budget needs to be on the table. If you vote no on 60 - you just blew the only chance we've had in 18 years to do somthing about it.
You just gave me a new way to look at it. Voting yes on 60 puts the financial controls in the state capital building - not what I'd consider the best financial planners by a long shot.
Thanks, I'm glad I voted to keep the control at the lowest level of government possible. It's where real people can have influence rather than the power brokers in the senate or house.
I voted no on 60 because at the district level I have some say in the budget. At the state level I have to rely on some slimebag that everyone elected to do the right thing (like that's ever gonna happen).
I think my chances of promoting real changes are better at the district level.
"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln