Something the Dog Said wrote: We finally have politicians who can implement successful programs that save the taxpayers billions of dollars, save millions of jobs. . .
For your sake, I certainly hope you are kidding.
The facts speak for themselves.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
That it will "fail again later" is the usual conservative partisan crap-response. Unless you can see into the future, you're just jones-ing to bash someone. This wasn't about "letting one company fail"--this was about trying to preserve the jobs of about 1.4 million people in the entire supply-chain as well as the GM employees.
LadyJazzer wrote: That it will "fail again later" is the usual conservative partisan crap-response. Unless you can see into the future, you're just jones-ing to bash someone. This wasn't about "letting one company fail"--this was about trying to preserve the jobs of about 1.4 million people in the entire supply-chain as well as the GM employees.
Jeez....
Too bad the other 14.5 million who are unemployed didn't get their jobs saved. They should have belong to a union instead of being just another legal American.
If you can't save all jobs you shouldn't save any? Oh, I forgot, you're a rightie. You don't care about the jobs of anyone that makes less than $250,000 per annum.
ckm8 wrote: If you can't save all jobs you shouldn't save any? Oh, I forgot, you're a rightie. You don't care about the jobs of anyone that makes less than $250,000 per annum.
Why should the government save any jobs? :PacifyBaby:
I was right again! GM Stock closed up 3.6% from the offering price. Currently, it's down in after market trading.
Again, I wonder who was buying up all the stock from the Treasury today? Was it the same people that partake in the $ 193 billion giveaway last week?