BREAKING NEWS: North Korea is firing on South Korea Island

23 Nov 2010 07:42 #11 by FredHayek
They were South Korean Marines.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 07:45 #12 by mtntrekker

Nobody that matters wrote: I think he'll sit them down and have a very serious talk about the serious nature of their actions.

He'll expect an immediate apology.

Then he'll figure out how to use the situation to spend another couple o' billion dollars.


ugggh i think you are right. no matter what, time to throw money we don't have at the problem.

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 09:33 #13 by Travelingirl
Is N. Korea's attack on S. Korea a test of Barry's lack of leadership in dealing with Foreign Policy? Has Barry emboldened our enemies?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 09:38 #14 by archer
I knew if you all could come up with a way to blame Obama you would jump at the chance.

N Korea has been on a power trip for years....this is exactly how wars start........(implied in that is.... rather than starting wars with countries that haven't attacked anyone, like Iraq). The problem becomes, where would we get the troops and equipment to even rattle a sabre over there? Bush committed them all to the middle east. That is one way to embolden a potential enemy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 09:41 #15 by LadyJazzer
Since Bush had 8 years to bring them to the table...and didn't... Hmmmmm.... Yep, must be Obama's fault...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 09:45 #16 by aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

LadyJazzer wrote: Since Bush had 8 years to bring them to the table...and didn't... Hmmmmm.... Yep, must be Obama's fault...


And the chlamydia speaks rofllol :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 10:03 #17 by Nmysys
Bear in mind that the War in Korea has never officially been ended, only an Armistice was signed. There have been literally thousands of attacks of one kind of another since June of 1953.

Whether or not our Liberal friends will admit it, Obama's Foreign Policy has left a lot to be desired in maintaining our stance in the world as the superpower. We need not remind them that the intelligence that everyone in the world signed on to, including the Democrats, said that Saddam had WMDs. The past is the past, but Obama would rather apologize for the U.S.A than to do anything concerning foreign policy. Look at how long it took him to commit more troops to Afghanistan, the War that he said was his.

To this day, IMO, he is still campaigning, not governing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 10:05 #18 by Scruffy

Nmysys wrote: Bear in mind that the War in Korea has never officially been ended, only an Armistice was signed. There have been literally thousands of attacks of one kind of another since June of 1953.

Whether or not our Liberal friends will admit it, Obama's Foreign Policy has left a lot to be desired in maintaining our stance in the world as the superpower. We need not remind them that the intelligence that everyone in the world signed on to, including the Democrats, said that Saddam had WMDs. The past is the past, but Obama would rather apologize for the U.S.A than to do anything concerning foreign policy. Look at how long it took him to commit more troops to Afghanistan, the War that he said was his.

To this day, IMO, he is still campaigning, not governing.


Specifically, what about Obama's Foreign Policy is lacking?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 10:06 #19 by Grady

travelingirl wrote: Is N. Korea's attack on S. Korea a test of Barry's lack of leadership in dealing with Foreign Policy? Has Barry emboldened our enemies?

Agreed.
I don’t think N Korea does much of anything without China’s tacit approval. There was a sinking of the S. Korean destroyer; shots across the border, Chinese sub missile launch 30 miles off the coast of California, the nuclear expansion news and now this attack. The Chinese are testing Obama, I hope he doesn’t capitulate.

A side note A long time ago I participated in war games on the Korean peninsula, alongside Korean Marines. They are tough bunch of SOBs, I’d be proud to have them on my side any day of the week. It has to be very very hard for them not to be retaliating.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Nov 2010 10:10 #20 by Travelingirl

archer wrote: I knew if you all could come up with a way to blame Obama you would jump at the chance.

N Korea has been on a power trip for years....this is exactly how wars start........(implied in that is.... rather than starting wars with countries that haven't attacked anyone, like Iraq). The problem becomes, where would we get the troops and equipment to even rattle a sabre over there? Bush committed them all to the middle east. That is one way to embolden a potential enemy.



Fact: Liberals are considered weak on the international scene. N. Korea knows Barry is a weak president. The world has lost respect for the once-super powerful, fierce, strong America. The White House has just released word that it "condemns" the attack by the N. Korea. I'm sure a serious response like that will frighten the hell out of them!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.161 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+