Yeah, all those parents who had good jobs before the Bush Recession got them laid off, through no fault of their own, should have seen it coming and just not "popped them out."
But we'll be sure to guarantee that Paris Hilton will keep her tax-break... (It just won't be paid for.)
Maybe this is the reason for LJ's claims. It seems that her beloved Socialist government is more interested in this issue than in paying for the lunches of her so called needy children.
I wonder who makes the decision as to who is needy?
Pigford II Settlement Partially Funded by Cuts to Child Nutrition Programs
by Publius
Congress is rushing through its lame duck session to finally appropriate funds to pay out claims from the Pigford II settlement. The settlement is meant to clear up claims from black farmers who claim discrimination from USDA and also missed out on the first settlement.
The legislation sets aside $1.5 billion to pay these claims. The legislation also makes cuts in other federal programs to “pay for” the new spending. Among the cuts are $500 million for nutrition programs for women, infants and children.
From the Senate language:
Subtitle E–Rescission of Funds From WIC Program
SEC. 841. RESCISSION OF FUNDS FROM WIC PROGRAM.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of the amounts made available in appropriations Acts to provide grants to States under the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children established by section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786), $562,000,000 is rescinded.
Well.
The left likes to couch everything they do as for “the children” and the disadvantaged. Okay, so, why cut funds from child nutrition to pay a second round of claims for a lawsuit surrounded by allegations of fraud?
It is simple, really. The left is really about pay-offs to interest groups. If a child nutrition program loses funds, well, that’s the price to pay to move money around to a more favored group.
rofllol 
