LadyJazzer wrote: It's not a "rant"... It's an article about how people that get their news from FauxNews are woefully uninformed...
But, I can GO on a rant, to show you the difference!
But your source is biased. Just like Media Matters is biased.
And everyone needs to rememeber other media is biased too, remember the story about side saddle gas tanks where NBC had to use explosives to demonstrate their point? I forgot, according to the Left, only Fox News can be biased.
Or where the NY Times would release stolen diplomatic cables but not print the climate change e-mails.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
LadyJazzer wrote: It's not a "rant"... It's an article about how people that get their news from FauxNews are woefully uninformed...
But, I can GO on a rant, to show you the difference!
But your source is biased. Just like Media Matters is biased.
And everyone needs to rememeber other media is biased too, remember the story about side saddle gas tanks where NBC had to use explosives to demonstrate their point? I forgot, according to the Left, only Fox News can be biased.
Or where the NY Times would release stolen diplomatic cables but not print the climate change e-mails.
The problem with this theory is that ANY source that does not agree with you is biased.
LadyJazzer wrote: It's an article about how people that get their news from FauxNews are woefully uninformed...
No, it's some lefty blogger's blurry version of a reputable study. The blogger's conclusions are not upheld by the study. But hey it's a lefty blog so it must be true. :Koolaid: Don't bother with the facts.
It's funny that none of the Fox News cultists have chosen to address the proof that management actively influences the information it disseminates to benefit a particular ideology, nor are they concerned