I didn't like it when Bush did it either. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing for me. However, I am completely for bringing down Obama! What a funny thing to say that conservatives want bring him down even if "we bring down America". The opposite will be the case when Obama is brought down...it will be an improvement to say the least!
Trouble wrote: I didn't like it when Bush did it either. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing for me. However, I am completely for bringing down Obama! What a funny thing to say that conservatives want bring him down even if "we bring down America". The opposite will be the case when Obama is brought down...it will be an improvement to say the least!
I wish I could believe that, but from what I see and hear from the new guys on the block in congress, they are so intent upon bringing down anything with Obama's name attached to it, they couldn't care less what disasterous effects it will have on our economy and our citizens. they don't get input from the economists.....they ignore advice even from their own party members with more experience and cooler heads.....they take budget office predictions and throw them out the window. They want Obama to fail so badly that they are placingthe future of this country in jeopardy, and they just don't give a damn what happens. Yes.....I find that both scary.....and appalling.
ahhh archer, spinning so early in the day! You remind me of the town cryer, but one that 2 years to late..ohh..bush did it, so..its ok with obama, he has every right to do it as well...No he doesn't..do you have a problem with vetting? Both sides..The people obama has as his czars are crooks, tax cheats, communists, yet..in the lib's drunken power surge, your ok with who he has as czars. I remember you once saying you were not a commited socialist, if you are ok with his pick..then you colors are laid bare..not much to debate is there archer!
Trouble wrote: I didn't like it when Bush did it either. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing for me. However, I am completely for bringing down Obama! What a funny thing to say that conservatives want bring him down even if "we bring down America". The opposite will be the case when Obama is brought down...it will be an improvement to say the least!
I wish I could believe that, but from what I see and hear from the new guys on the block in congress, they are so intent upon bringing down anything with Obama's name attached to it, they couldn't care less what disasterous effects it will have on our economy and our citizens. they don't get input from the economists.....they ignore advice even from their own party members with more experience and cooler heads.....they take budget office predictions and throw them out the window. They want Obama to fail so badly that they are placingthe future of this country in jeopardy, and they just don't give a damn what happens. Yes.....I find that both scary.....and appalling.
The "more experienced and cooler heads" are the RHINOS and we want them ignored. Secondly, getting Obama out of the White House has to happen. The damage he and his administration have done to our country will take years to fix.
This has been a good news week for conservatives...Wisconsin, NPR, Planned Parenthood, EPA, and the list goes on. I guess I can see why you're so scared! :scared:
"Everyone who leads large masses of people and is excessively idolized by them must be vigorously opposed, however enlightened or holy he may be, irrespective of his office or profession. "
K'ang Yu-wei
:Whistle
Do you really believe in that statement?
I'm not sure if I should answer that. Are you with the FBI or the Obama Administration by chance?
All kidding aside, I'm not sure if I believe the quote or not....but I found it as thought provoking at the moment I read it and still do. What do you think of it as you reflect on what's going on in America's political arena right now.
K'ang Yu-wei
K'ang Yu-wei (1858-1927) was one of the most prominent scholars of modern China, particularly famous for his radical reinterpretations of Confucianism and for his role as the Emperor's adviser during the abortive Hundred Days Reform movement of 1898.
In the late 19th century the helplessness of China in the face of the imperialist powers was becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. Chinese literati, who in midcentury had been supremely confident of the superiority of China's traditional ways, were becoming aware in the 1880s and 1890s that their nation's political institutions and economic system must be reformed if China were to avoid becoming a colony of the Europeans.
K'ang Yu-wei was born near Canton to a scholarly and locally prominent family on March 19, 1858. Like his father and grandfather, K'ang prepared for a bureaucratic career by studying the Confucian classics
This person was no dummy. Maybe we should stop for moment and think about his perspective before discarding him. Perhaps we can learn from the past.
I am not with the FBI or CIA, although I am quite certain that they both have a file on me. I do support much of what the current admin has tried to accomplish & I am still waiting for my appointment as Fly Fishing Czar (any day now).
The statement: "Everyone who leads large masses of people and is excessively idolized by them must be vigorously opposed, however enlightened or holy he may be, irrespective of his office or profession" is definately a reflection of what is currently going on although I might replace the word "Opposed" with scrutinized. This statement goes along way to support "Derangement Syndromes" noted on this Board. More specifically for Bush, Obama as well as Palin.
outdoor338 wrote: ahhh archer, spinning so early in the day! You remind me of the town cryer, but one that 2 years to late..ohh..bush did it, so..its ok with obama, he has every right to do it as well...
If you were capable of reading posts instead of assuming that you, in your infinite wisdom, know what they they say......you would know that I specifically did NOT say it was OK because Bush did it too. Now go back and read what I posted.
Ok, now that you have read it you know that what I was saying is you Republicans are a bunch of hypocrits if you condemn Obama for having czars but never condemned Bush for the same thing. Can you, in your tiny little brain distinguish the difference in what I posted vs your corrupted version of my post? Probably not, you are much like the new house members.....so blinded by your hate you would trash the country I love, just to get your revenge for having elected Obama.
I will vote for you as the fly fishing Czar...ya never know..
I am like trouble, I have no good feeling towards obama and what he is doing to this country. He's a smart man, as a lawyer, not as a president. He has divided this country like I have never seen in my lifetime. I will say, there has been no president that has been perfect..but many liberals paint obama as the messiah...right archer?
I am not with the FBI or CIA, although I am quite certain that they both have a file on me. I do support much of what the current admin has tried to accomplish & I am still waiting for my appointment as Fly Fishing Czar (any day now).
The statement: "Everyone who leads large masses of people and is excessively idolized by them must be vigorously opposed, however enlightened or holy he may be, irrespective of his office or profession" is definately a reflection of what is currently going on although I might replace the word "Opposed" with scrutinized. This statement goes along way to support "Derangement Syndromes" noted on this Board. More specifically for Bush, Obama as well as Palin.
Fly-fishing Czar? Does that job pay?
Frankly, conservative or liberal.....Republican or Democrat...I have serious reservations about any elected official who takes on a pop star status. It seems that when they do, it's more about "them" and less about their people. If that's deranged...then so be it.
I do like Obama in that he has rallied the folks...the tea party folks anyway! And we're seeing the results in some of the votes in the House this week. I'm feeling some "hope & change" in the air...how about you??
