- Posts: 14766
- Thank you received: 2
SS109 wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: I repeat, the Republicans have shown them so much love, and given them so many reasons to vote Republican... I hope they keep it up.
It has nothing to do with your lame assumption that everyone who is Hispanic needs help...It has to do with the fact that to the Right-wing "thinkers", EVERYONE who is Hispanic is somehow grouped together and is somehow "in need of something." You treat them all as "less-than"...It will come back to haunt you. And I hope you keep it up.
Not all Republicans are this way. Reagan granted the illegals amnesty, "W" wanted to grant them amnesty again. W's brother married a Hispanic woman and speaks Spanish pretty well. Looking at the new census figures, Hispanics are at 50 million and rising quicker than any other group. It is more than likely my Social Security benefits will be paid by the up and coming generation of Latino workers.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It looks like the majority of legal Latino immigrants vote Democrat, were born in the US, over half support allowing illegal immigrants to stay and obtain legal status, over a third graduated college, and 45% of them make over $70K/year. BearMtn, I think your sample might be biased.About Us: Latino Community Research
The William C. Velasquez Institute has been answering statistical questions about the Latino community since it was founded in 1985. The links below represent various datasets, research projects, and publications produced or gathered by WCVI.
Toplines for WCVI Exit Poll Results for November 4, 2008 General ElectionAbout the Exit Survey
The William C. Velásquez Institute (WCVI) conducted an exit poll to measure how Latinos voted during the November 2008 General elections. Methodology: The William C. Velasquez Institute (WCVI) emailed over 160,000 mostly Latino registered voters in randomly drawn precincts from the eleven States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Emails were sent the morning of 11/4/2008 and survey gathered information until 11/8/2008 . Emails for registered voters were identified using the complete voter registration databases in all the named states. The email survey had both English and Spanish translations.
Census Finds Huge Growth in Hispanic Voters
The Census Bureau on Tuesday released a treasure trove of voting statistics, http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p20-562.pdf but perhaps most interesting were statistics comparing the Hispanic vote between 2004 and 2008. Here's Governing magazine's Josh Goodman on what happened:
The Census estimates that there were 9.745 million Hispanic voters in 2008, compared to 7.587 million in 2004 — an increase of 28.4%. Overall, an estimated 131.114 million Americans voted in 2008, compared to 125.736 million in 2004, an increase of just 4.3%. Another way of looking at it: there were 5.4 million additional votes cast in 2008 compared to 2004 and about 2.2 million of them were cast by Hispanics.
Overall, this has to be seen as good news for Democrats — when a group that makes up half of all new voters polls in your favor by a 2-to-1 margin (Obama polled at 67% in exit polls among Hispanics). It remains to be seen whether Hispanics continue to increase their participation rate (their voting rate was still only 49%, compared with 66% for non-Hispanic whites and 65% for blacks). But even if their voting rate falls off, growth among the Hispanic population will still make them a larger and larger proportion of the pool of voters.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
deltamrey wrote: OK - here are a few FACTS: Spain in 1492 sent C Columbus and a group of conquistodores to the West to plunder gold and silver from the new world. They were over 75-100 years exceptionally successful and Spain became the world power for 150 years. This handful of Spain's finest conquered lands from Canada to Central America.....thus New Spain. Along the way they impregnated the indian population and thus today the "half breed" population. They are not Spainairds. After 300 years there were only 2500 pure Spainairds in New Spain - and they lost New Spain because there just were not enough to hold the territory. FACTS.
A parallel: the Dutch settled Conneticut, New Amsterdam (New York) , Penn, Maryland, New Jersey......but also had inadequate Dutch in numbers to hold the lands - thus the English took it and today we have New York........did the English steal the lands - well sort of but the Dutch were too few to keep it. Spain lost New Spain for the same reason.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
When it comes to opinions of President Barack Obama, a greater share of Latino registered voters approve of his job performance than do all U.S. registered voters-63% versus 47%.
The new survey also reveals that the Democratic Party continues to hold a large advantage in party identification among Latino registered voters. More than six-in-ten (62%) Latino registered voters say they identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, while one-quarter (25%) say the same for the Republican Party.
Democrats are seen as the party that has more concern for Hispanics. Nearly half (47%) of Latino registered voters say this about the Democratic Party-down from 55% in 2008, but similar to the share on this question expressed by Latinos for much of the past decade. In contrast, very few see the Republican Party as more concerned about Latinos than the Democratic Party-just 6% of all Latino registered voters and 18% of Republican Latino registered voters say this.
They aren't going to vote Republican if this big of a percentage favor allowing illegals to stay after qualifications are met (despite the fact that neither party really does much other than "for show" speeches, but the perception is all that matters and the perception is that Republicans aren't as sympathetic as Democrats toward this issue - who do you think they'll vote for?)For example, fully 86% of Latinos support providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants if they pass background checks, pay a fine and have jobs, a level of support far greater than among the general public (68%). Among Latinos, about eight-in-ten (82%) of the native born and nine-in-ten (90%) of the foreign born say they support providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
On birthright citizenship, nearly eight-in-ten (78%) Latinos say the Constitution should be left as is, compared with 56% of the general public who say the same. And when it comes to who should enforce the nation's immigration laws, more than three-quarters (77%) Latinos say it should be the exclusive responsibility of federal authorities, while just 15% say the local police should play a more active role. On both questions, the native born and the foreign born hold similar views.
Finally, the vast majority of Latinos-79%-disapprove of the first-of-its-kind Arizona law enacted this year that gives police broad powers to check the immigration status of people they stop for other reasons whom they suspect may be in this country illegally.[2] By contrast, the general population approves of the measure by a ratio of two-to-one.
The William C. Velasquez Institute (WCVI) emailed over 160,000 mostly Latino registered voters in randomly drawn precincts from the eleven States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.