Should storm-damaged states get federal aid?

04 May 2011 12:14 #101 by major bean

Soulshiner wrote: The federal government denied Texas a major disaster declaration because recovery needs from wildfires did not exceed what the state could handle, a federal emergency management official said Wednesday.

An assessment of damage from fires that scorched 2.2 million acres since November determined that Texas did not require assistance beyond the 22 federal fire management assistance grants already awarded to the state, according to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

"FEMA has been in close contact with the state since the fires occurred, and based on the information they provided, it was determined that there was not a need for additional support at this time," FEMA spokeswoman Rachel Racusen said in a statement. "We will continue to work closely with the state and local emergency management officials."

http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/05/04 ... z1LPMuT5sd

That is as it should be.

Regards,
Major Bean

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2011 12:32 #102 by jf1acai
Agree, IF they do not really need it, they shouldn't get it.

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.134 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+