Well yeah...it was edited to fit the pictures....the fact is they took a whole section out and that section had the words "under God, indivisible"Was anyone outraged that indivisible was missing. We are so quick to think the worst of people.
archer wrote: Well yeah...it was edited to fit the pictures....the fact is they took a whole section out and that section had the words "under God, indivisible"Was anyone outraged that indivisible was missing. We are so quick to think the worst of people.
Here is my feelings on it. If one cannot say it they way it is written to be said then do not say it. It is just like the National Anthem, some try to sing it the way they think it should be sung. NOT. Sing it they way it should be or leave it alone.
Frick and Frack at it again defending the indefensible....what a surprise. Here's one more palatable for you both:
The Liberal Pledge Of Allegiance
"I pledge allegiance to the flag and my constitutional rights with which it comes. And to the diversity, in which our nation stands, one nation, part of one planet, with liberty, freedom, choice and justice for all."
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
What "indefensible"? Some anti-communist clown gets obsessed with inserting religion into something designed to be a pledge to the flag, and it accidentally gets left out and this is "indefensible"? rofllol
