PrintSmith wrote: Our nation would be much better off adopting this and teaching it to the posterity than it would be in continuing to use the Pledge of Allegiance. The use of "inseparable" is still a bit troublesome as could be taken to imply that the states may not separate themselves from the union though. If "inseparable" is seen as meaning that coordinate sovereignty is an integral part of that perfect union, however, then it does a much better job of informing the populace and explaining our system of government in proper terms.
You guys are taking it too seriously. I just read it and think of my childhood and the founding fathers. It is just considered history and nothing more.
