Breitbart: We have the guns...

Like the president said - it's not class warfare --- it's math.

Whose math do you trust?

To Breitbart, its not class warfare. It's warfare warfare he's in favor of.

After listening to the the entire thing, it's scary how off balance he seemed to be in that video.

Wayne is now editing his earlier posts to appear less pathetic because he sees no time and edit stamp like PC uses. Shame on you Wayne. When I screw up I laugh and move on.

It started as Class envy but now is becoming class warfare.

Free people will only be pressed so far before they rebel. Obama can keep up his socialist agenda and the democrats can keep cheering from the side lines, at some point enough will be too much. I look to 2012 and the election to be a real turning point for our nation. What comes after the election will be a reflection of those who have the means to conduct a rebellion verses those who are willing to trust Obama and his failed administration through another four years of ruin.

I'm not calling for the violent overthrow of the US Government and I don't advocate violence from any extremist group against out government, but it strikes me as elementary that there are people and organized groups who are less moderate than me. As the economy continues to slide and the current administration continues to advocate measures that will ensure the complete destruction of our nation I can only point to the truths and stand aside as those who have been pushed too far rebel.

Nmysys wrote: It started as Class envy but now is becoming class warfare.

It certainly is...

Don't tread on the productive, don't tread on the job creators, don't tread on the risk takers.....

In other words, only tax the poor and unemployed?

Wayne-O wrote: In other words, only tax the poor and unemployed?

Did I say that? NO. The poor and unemployed would benefit far more if businesses were allowed to be as successful as possible. The left's answer is always a short term infusion of taxes and not a long term fix for a healthy economy.

In other words, tax on a truly fair basis - either a flat tax or a consumption tax - rather than enticing people to vote for you premised on the belief that you will use the power and force of government to take the fruits of the citizen of one state in order to provide for the individual welfare of a citizen in a different state.

The individual welfare of the citizens of the States is not a federal concern, it is a State concern. That is as simple as the statement can be made. There are times, such as in the wake of Katrina, where one of the states may need additional help from their fellow union members, but it should be on an as needed, rather than a continual, basis that such help is provided. The member States of the union are independent and sovereign entities - so say the constitutions of the States and the national Constitution - and it is high time we returned to putting that reality back into practice. There are certain powers that each state surrendered to the federal government when it joined the union, but the States did not surrender all of their power and sovereignty by joining the union. We can see that the federal attempt to consolidate all powers, foreign and domestic, unto itself has led us to a place where the general welfare of all of the States in the union is in jeopardy as a result of federal overreach into the domestic affairs of the citizens of the States.

I am not a citizen of California, Montana, New York, Florida, Texas, Alaska or any other state that belongs to this union of states, I am a citizen of the sovereign and independent State of Colorado. My first duty is to the fellow citizens of my own state, not the citizens of other states, whether they belong to the same union as my own or a different one. There is a difference between being taxed to provide for the benefit of the citizens of my own state and being taxed to provide for the benefit of citizens of a different state entirely.

We do not have a national government located in Washington, D.C., we have a federal government located there, a federal government whose national authority rests in overseeing the foreign affairs of the states that belong to the union, not the domestic ones. It is time, past time actually, to put an end to this experiment of having a national government instead of a federal one.