Question for the Cain supporters

30 Oct 2011 15:15 #51 by archer

SS109 wrote:

archer wrote: How do we pay for these huge tax breaks for corps? quote]

You mean like GE that paid no coporate tax last year? The current system is so riddled with loopholes, the US goverment will be able to take more if in a flat tax, no exemptions world.

Exactly...we need to close the loopholes and stop corporate welfare.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:15 #52 by Arlen

The Viking wrote:

Arlen wrote: Viking, Perry has already destroyed his chances with his illegal immigration policy. The jobs created by Perry are those low paying jobs that are filled with illegal aliens who work for wages below the minimum wage with no benefits.

Then consider Ni**erhead.

Perry is history! He is finished.

Viking, give it up.



:rofl rofllol :lol: I know you aren't but you sound just like a Liberal. You say what they say! And the fact that you bring up Ni**erhead is hilarious!! And the illegals will soon be a non issue.

You want to go that route I guess we can bring up saying Blacks are brainwashed and are still on the Plantation. And he wanted to electrocute Latinos and many groups are against him now and he caused a Latino leader in the Republican party to quit. And his church supported Malcom X.

And you are talking about a note on a rock that someone else put there! You seriously want to compare the two?


Viking, I do not believe that Perry put any thought to the sign on the hunting property. I know that he did not write it and gave it no thought. But, as a politician, he should have immediately had it removed if for no other reason than to keep himself from being smeared later. That oversight has cost him. The negative perception by the public may not be accurate, but it is their perception.

Cain has given an accurate estimate of his appeal in the black community and has given the reason (brainwashing) for the black allegiance to the Democratic party. He has not pandered to them nor said what they want to hear to win their votes. In doing so, he is willing to win or lose by his statement of truth. THAT is called statesmanship.

Cain will rise or fall by his straightforwardness. If he falls, I am perfectly willing to support whoever wins the nomination, because any Republican is better than Obama.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:29 #53 by The Viking

archer wrote: That's about the most convoluted logic I ever read. Are you admitting you lied? Nevermind, you lie so much you can't distinguish a lie from the truth.

FYI...I am all for bringing jobs back to the US...but I would like the emphasis to be on good paying jobs, and not at the expense of education. Apparently Perry doesnt think education is very important. I guess he thinks conservatives would do better in future election if the voters are uneducated. He's probably right.


Ok, here is a question for you. Would you rather have 5 people employed making $20,000 or 2 people employed making $50,000?

You libs always complain about how much OTHER people's companies can pay people. I don't see YOU hiring anyone at $50,000. AT LEAST THEY HAVE JOBS AND DIGNITY AND CAN EAT!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:36 #54 by archer
Why must it be either/or? Why not both?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:43 #55 by archer
I wonder viking...would you give up your job to make $20,000? Do you think that's good enough? Is that the best an educated American should aspire to? Do we want all the low wage jobs here and let all the jobs for educated/skilled workers to go overseas? What the hell are you advocating for here? American mediocrity??

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:48 #56 by The Viking

archer wrote: Why must it be either/or? Why not both?


I knew you wouldn't answer as you really dno't understand. let me type slower...... A COMPANY ONLY HAS $100,000 TO HIRE PEOPLE. IT IS AN EITHER OR!!! WHAT IS BETTER??? HIRING 5 AT $20,000 OR 2 AT $50,000. For some reason you are stuck in the Liberal, I can print money or pull it out of my ass mentality. THAT IS NOT REALITY FOR COMPANIES!!! So which one is better? (he asks knowing she will spin around the answer again)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:51 #57 by The Viking

archer wrote: I wonder viking...would you give up your job to make $20,000? Do you think that's good enough? Is that the best an educated American should aspire to? Do we want all the low wage jobs here and let all the jobs for educated/skilled workers to go overseas? What the hell are you advocating for here? American mediocrity??


OMG!!!! You are f'n with me right? You are not really that slow today are you? Why would I have to give up my job? WE ARE TALKING ABOUT UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE WHO NEED ANY JOB JUST TO EAT!! So if there is a company hiring and has only $100,000, and there are 5 people standing there need any work to feed their family. Should that company hire all 5 at $20,000 each or should they just hire 2 for $50,000 and leave 3 of them standing on the street unemployed for the government to continue to take care of?

MY GOD! I feel like I am back in third grade here!

(Waiting for the spin......)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:57 - 30 Oct 2011 15:58 #58 by archer
You started with the silly hypotheticals Viking, OK, I'll play your stupid game.....a company has $100,000 to hire people, why would they have a choice between to $50k jobs or 5 $20k jobs.....why not 2 $40k jobs and one $20k job, or one $50k job and 2 $20k, and a $10k internship?.....or any number of options. The pay per job should be based on the job, not on the number of jobs per a certain dollar amount amount. That was the stupidest attempt at paintinig someone into a corner I have ever read. Judging by your posts if you were back in 3rd grade you would flunk.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:58 #59 by The Viking
So if they hire all 5 then you Libs, instead of thanking the company for hiring 5 people will bitch about how they are not paying them enough and they ALL should get $50,000. THEY DON'T HAVE $250,000 TO PAY THEM!!! That is the liberal entitlement mentality!! You are never happy! I on the other hand thank God that 5 people can at least feed their family now. Are they living high on the hog? NO but $1667 per month can get a roof over your head and food on your table! I have lived on far less than that and lived just fine! It is $1667 per month more than they had! Or would you prefer that 3 of them get nothing and live on welfare and 2 of them get $4167 each so they can keep up with the Jones? So you either complain that people aren't paying enough when they hire, or you complain they aren't hiring enough people. You can't have it both ways! NEVER HAPPY what others are doing to heop and hire people. Even though you aren't hiring anyone!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

30 Oct 2011 15:59 #60 by archer
The only one bitching around here is you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.141 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+