archer wrote: You started with the silly hypotheticals Viking, OK, I'll play your stupid game.....a company has $100,000 to hire people, why would they have a choice between to $50k jobs or 5 $20k jobs.....why not 2 $40k jobs and one $20k job, or one $50k job and 2 $20k, and a $10k internship?.....or any number of options. The pay per job should be based on the job, not on the number of jobs per a certain dollar amount amount. That was the stupidest attempt at paintinig someone into a corner I have ever read. Judging by your posts if you were back in 3rd grade you would flunk.
Fine so you are saying that you would prefer NOT to hire all of them and pay more to the others. Got it!
archer wrote: You started with the silly hypotheticals Viking, OK, I'll play your stupid game.....a company has $100,000 to hire people, why would they have a choice between to $50k jobs or 5 $20k jobs.....why not 2 $40k jobs and one $20k job, or one $50k job and 2 $20k, and a $10k internship?.....or any number of options. The pay per job should be based on the job, not on the number of jobs per a certain dollar amount amount. That was the stupidest attempt at paintinig someone into a corner I have ever read. Judging by your posts if you were back in 3rd grade you would flunk.
Fine so you are saying that you would prefer NOT to hire all of them and pay more to the others. Got it!
archer wrote: You started with the silly hypotheticals Viking, OK, I'll play your stupid game.....a company has $100,000 to hire people, why would they have a choice between to $50k jobs or 5 $20k jobs.....why not 2 $40k jobs and one $20k job, or one $50k job and 2 $20k, and a $10k internship?.....or any number of options. The pay per job should be based on the job, not on the number of jobs per a certain dollar amount amount. That was the stupidest attempt at paintinig someone into a corner I have ever read. Judging by your posts if you were back in 3rd grade you would flunk.
Fine so you are saying that you would prefer NOT to hire all of them and pay more to the others. Got it!
Do you think that yelling will make your post true? Really Viking, what is so hard for you to understand? Once again.....If a company has $100k to spend on hiring, in the real world (as compared to your fantasy world) they will hire as many people as needed to fill what jobs they can, and will pay according to what the job is worth, NOT some crazy ass idea that they will either hire 5 people at $20k.....or 2 people at $50k. If you had a company and needed an engineer....would you really think you could get a competent engineer at $20k? I don't care if you hire 5 people at $20k, you still won't get the equivalent of one or 2 good engineers. NOW do you understand how stupid your hypothetical is?
Of course you don't, you have a point to make and you will stick to your fantasy no matter what, kinda like you stick with Perry in the face of all his shortcomings and the fact that conservatives really don't like him anymore.
I'm with you outdoor, I'd just as soon sit here and munch on popcorn as try to get viking to understand the simplest of ideas about how corporate hiring is done. Who in this world thinks that corporations hire based on how many people they can get for a specified dollar amount as opposed to actually hiring the personnel they need for the specific jobs they have open?
I'm with you outdoor, I'd just as soon sit here and munch on popcorn as try to get viking to understand the simplest of ideas about how corporate hiring is done. Who in this world thinks that corporations hire based on how many people they can get for a specified dollar amount as opposed to actually hiring the personnel they need for the specific jobs they have open?
OK, it is official. You can try and spin an example all you want. But you have just made yourself look totally ignorant! I bring up that Perry has produced a million jobs and all you can do is complain that they don't pay enough. You Libs are NEVER satisfied. Maybe he should have done like Obama and LOST 2.5 million jobs and then you would be happy? All you can do is complain about what everyone else is doing even when they are the only ones trying and porducing jobs. While you are sitting in your camper on your laptop not having to worry about money. Armchair quarterbacks who do nothing to help people get jobs but always complain when others do because they feel they should pay them more are pathetic!
And if you think outdoor is saying that, then you are more delusional than VL!
The Viking wrote: A COMPANY ONLY HAS $100,000 TO HIRE PEOPLE. IT IS AN EITHER OR!!! WHAT IS BETTER??? HIRING 5 AT $20,000 OR 2 AT $50,000. For some reason you are stuck in the Liberal, I can print money or pull it out of my ass mentality. THAT IS NOT REALITY FOR COMPANIES!!! So which one is better? (he asks knowing she will spin around the answer again)
If this isn't what you meant....then why the hell did you post it?
I'm hoping that there is a viable candidate in the wings that will enter the race when it becomes clear that no e of the current front runners will be able to beat Obama. I'm not interested in electing yet another incompetent leader. We really can't afford it. Time is running out. It's not about Republicans winning or Democrats winning. It's about Americans winning. As I see it, Cain is a Republican Obama. Perry may or may not be able to recover from the early missteps, but as of now he is not electable. Romney has been looked at and found wanting too many times to generate enough excitement to overcome a sitting president. Paul is blacklisted by the party bigwigs. The rest? Forget about them. So what do we have left? Arrrgh!
Why don't the Republicans even look at Huntsman? Is it because independents and even some democrats find him acceptable? Do Republicans really want to go with a candidate so far right that they can't hope to attract any voters except the party faithful?
