Question for the Cain supporters

archer wrote: Why don't the Republicans even look at Huntsman? Is it because independents and even some democrats find him acceptable? Do Republicans really want to go with a candidate so far right that they can't hope to attract any voters except the party faithful?

archer you didn't get an answer to your question: Huntsman is a RINO, not as bad a RINOMEY, but same from class.
This country (as much as you wish and your kind) is mostly Right Thinking. Last time round The ELITE suckered the U.S. (Gulity Right Thinkers, Leftist & "Independents") into voting in, a no talent, no experienced, super-star candidate, and all his HYPE about change & hope. No need to go there we al know where it has gotten us. Hell, oblama can't even keep his leftist friends under control. MOST THINKING PEOPLE don't want him in again. So, IMO, we'll see somebody from the Left Jump in, maybe at the convention, That would be a BLAST.
IMO, Americans, don't like what "THE ROCK is SAYING!" And what is it called when david duke supports the leftist OWS, fools?
Have a nice day.

Investigator: Herman Cain innocent of harassment charges
ATLANTA (CBS ATLANTA) - Private investigator TJ Ward said presidential hopeful Herman Cain was not lying at a news conference on Tuesday in Phoenix.

"If he is hiding something this thing would have spiked way down here," said Ward. "He is being truthful, totally truthful. He is a man with integrity and he talked directly about not knowing any incident he is accused of."

http://mrctv.org/videos/investigator-herman-cain-innocent-harassment-charges

TPP wrote: Investigator: Herman Cain innocent of harassment charges
ATLANTA (CBS ATLANTA) - Private investigator TJ Ward said presidential hopeful Herman Cain was not lying at a news conference on Tuesday in Phoenix.

"If he is hiding something this thing would have spiked way down here," said Ward. "He is being truthful, totally truthful. He is a man with integrity and he talked directly about not knowing any incident he is accused of."

http://mrctv.org/videos/investigator-herman-cain-innocent-harassment-charges

Research casts doubt on voice-stress lie detection technology

Voice-stress analysis, an alternative to the polygraph as a method for lie detection, is already widely used in police and insurance fraud investigations. Now, however, it is being touted as a powerful and effective tool for an array of new applications — everything from the screening of potential terrorists in the nation's airports to catching wayward spouses in messy marital disputes.

Despite its booming popularity, a number of federally sponsored studies have found little or no scientific evidence to support the notion that existing voice-stress technologies are capable of consistently detecting lies and deceptions.

[snip]

Still, while many governmental investigative, military and law enforcement agencies have expressed an eagerness to find a credible new means of lie detection, study after study has failed to yield strong scientific evidence in support of the technology.

http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/669.aspx

And this is no more admissible in court than a polygraph. So... what makes you think this means anything?

I believe that Herman doesn't think he has done anything wrong.....so he would probably pass a lie detector test too......he has that arrogant male persona that tells him whatever he wants to do is OK, just because he is Herman Cain. The woman are just accusing him because they are, well, women. And that is what women do. The man makes me ill every time I hear his smarmy remarks about this issue.

Two things: I believe the fact that Alred is involved is the very reason to suspect a high tech lynching of Cain. She is an ambulance chaser – and seeks out cases that will have media involvement. Greta went after her on the Meg Whitman case. Secondly I find it rather interesting that none of these women came forward when Cain announced he was running – nor was anything said UNTIL he #1: the polls showed he was beating Romney (who the Republican/GOP elites are in the tank for) and #2: A black man who could take some of the black vote away from the Usurper. This entire attack smells like the same thing Sarah Palin has had to endure for three years – nasty, dirty lies, denigration of not only her but her family – even her disadvanged baby! Anyone who rises to the top in the Conservative party will face somewhat the same treatment. The problem is so bad now that good people refuse to run – why experience what Herman Cain is now undergoing. I guess, out of spite to whoever is orchestrating this lynching. No more will I put up with character asasination. Look at Bill Clinton who had a string of women, even accused of rape – and the Democrats still love him! God help this country – how low have we stooped?

These women did not come forward on their own, I believe they were willing to just let it all be past history. Politico either ferreted out the info, or someone told them where to look, once the story broke and Cain responded with his denials, THEN the women felt they needed to speak out.

He could have nipped this in the bud back when the story broke by admitting there had been accusations and apologizing to the women saying he was sorry they felt that he had harassed them, that was never his intention. A little humble pie goes a long way. There are facts to back this up.....the filed complaints and the "settlement" being two of them.

outdoor338 wrote: This entire attack smells like the same thing Sarah Palin has had to endure for three years – nasty, dirty lies, denigration of not only her but her family

Or what Barrack Obama and his family have had to endure at the hands of the wingnuts... you among them.

outdoor338 wrote: Two things: I believe the fact that Alred is involved is the very reason to suspect a high tech lynching of Cain. She is an ambulance chaser – and seeks out cases that will have media involvement. Greta went after her on the Meg Whitman case. Secondly I find it rather interesting that none of these women came forward when Cain announced he was running – nor was anything said UNTIL he #1: the polls showed he was beating Romney (who the Republican/GOP elites are in the tank for) and #2: A black man who could take some of the black vote away from the Usurper.

Two of them did come forward at the time it happened. They were under a nondisclosure agreement until now. "Surprised" you didn't mention that.

If this is the best group of opponents you can find to challenge Obama you might as well save your money for 2016 and concede. There isn't a single person in that debate I would want as President. Garbage, the whole lot of them. What a weak field of candidates for the highest job in the land. Utterly inept. When Herman Cain is the front-runner, you have already lost.

Conservation Voice wrote: If this is the best group of opponents you can find to challenge Obama you might as well save your money for 2016 and concede. There isn't a single person in that debate I would want as President. Garbage, the whole lot of them. What a weak field of candidates for the highest job in the land. Utterly inept. When Herman Cain is the front-runner, you have already lost.

That's it then.