Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

04 Feb 2012 21:06 #41 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay
Ah..I was a 21 or 22 year old college student, so I wasn't in a squadren (?) and they showed me the lever to pull if instructed to eject....Thats it. I was a highly educated and skilled pilot at the time, I was a flight instructor and I think I had a 727 type rating at the time so the A-10 was not complicated in any way. It's a very forgiving aircraft that any novice could fly..


I was being recruited because they obviously thought I had the right stuff...Just like my father.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:09 #42 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

otisptoadwater wrote:

Vice Lord wrote: I logged the hours as PIC time..I have 2.4 hours in the A-10

Proud of that entry


So if you logged the time would you not have a record of the flight and the TAIL NUMBER of the aircraft?! Face it you got caught in a bold face lie and all you done is dance around the facts like a fart in a hot skillet.



I don't even know where my first 5 log books are right now...In the storage closet somewhere? Havent seen them since before I moved here, like 20 years

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:11 #43 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

navycpo7 wrote:

Vice Lord wrote: I logged the hours as PIC time..I have 2.4 hours in the A-10

Proud of that entry


I also doubt seriously you were PIC OR SIC or much of anything in a A10.



I was flying the plane...not the entire time, but most of it..I logged most of the hours as PIC

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:18 #44 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. Suddenly you have become a fully qualified test pilot on an experimental twin engine jet attack prototype aircraft in the same time frame? At the same time you are not an employee of Fairchild Republic or a qualified A-10 pilot in the USAF.

The scent coming off the holding pens at the Monfort processing plant in Greeley smells less like BS than the crap you are posting.


That was my very first license..(6-1 and 160 pounds) I was just a kid, I got it when I was 14..Single engine land- Thats how everyone starts out..My first 300 hours were in a Piper Cherokee and I'd rent Censna 150's and 180's when home..Then I flew the Archer, then The Warrior, then the multi engine Apache, then..etc..etc...etc... You progess to bigger and bigger equipment. I built and owned a Bensen Gyro Copter in Chicago..Flew it all over the place for years, it cost $5500 and took a year to build..Its like a motorcycle in the air. They don't work well up here or you'd see me flying around in it..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:27 #45 by navycpo7

Vice Lord wrote: Ah..I was a 21 or 22 year old college student, so I wasn't in a squadren (?) and they showed me the lever to pull if instructed to eject....Thats it. I was a highly educated and skilled pilot at the time, I was a flight instructor and I think I had a 727 type rating at the time so the A-10 was not complicated in any way. It's a very forgiving aircraft that any novice could fly..


I was being recruited because they obviously thought I had the right stuff...Just like my father.


OK let me see if I can explain this to you in simple terms. A military aircraft regardless of service, regardless of type of aircraft and regardless of its status unless decommissioned, is in a squadron. The second issue, prior to flying in a military aircraft for a instructional ride or any other type a civilian(you) would have gone through a 1 day or 2 day indoctrination course on the aircraft.

Now here is the kicker, There has never been an A 10 squadron at Patrick AFB. It has never been a base with combat aircraft assigned there. There were other things going on there, which my first ship while I was onboard did there and off the coast there. Patrick AFB was and still is part of space wing. There is also a Air Force Rescue Sqd there that flies HC-130P/N "King" variant of the C-130 Hercules and HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter. The Base use to be a Naval Air Station during WWII supporting seaplanes. That is it. It is more of a missle test facility along with a few others things these days. Ya really should quit lying about this type stuff.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:28 #46 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. Suddenly you have become a fully qualified test pilot on an experimental twin engine jet attack prototype aircraft in the same time frame? At the same time you are not an employee of Fairchild Republic or a qualified A-10 pilot in the USAF.

The scent coming off the holding pens at the Monfort processing plant in Greeley smells less like BS than the crap you are posting.



Is Drew Breees a test pilot for going up for a ride?..I went up for a ride and he let me take the controls..I also did that on a Commmercial flight in the mid 70's..I sat in the left seat and took the controls of a plane full of paying passengers.. lol ..Believe it or not-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:32 - 04 Feb 2012 21:39 #47 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

navycpo7 wrote:

Vice Lord wrote: Ah..I was a 21 or 22 year old college student, so I wasn't in a squadren (?) and they showed me the lever to pull if instructed to eject....Thats it. I was a highly educated and skilled pilot at the time, I was a flight instructor and I think I had a 727 type rating at the time so the A-10 was not complicated in any way. It's a very forgiving aircraft that any novice could fly..


I was being recruited because they obviously thought I had the right stuff...Just like my father.


OK let me see if I can explain this to you in simple terms. A military aircraft regardless of service, regardless of type of aircraft and regardless of its status unless decommissioned, is in a squadron. The second issue, prior to flying in a military aircraft for a instructional ride or any other type a civilian(you) would have gone through a 1 day or 2 day indoctrination course on the aircraft.

Now here is the kicker, There has never been an A 10 squadron at Patrick AFB. It has never been a base with combat aircraft assigned there. There were other things going on there, which my first ship while I was onboard did there and off the coast there. Patrick AFB was and still is part of space wing. There is also a Air Force Rescue Sqd there that flies HC-130P/N "King" variant of the C-130 Hercules and HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter. The Base use to be a Naval Air Station during WWII supporting seaplanes. That is it. It is more of a missle test facility along with a few others things these days. Ya really should quit lying about this type stuff.


Listen..I lived a few miles from there for four years..I flew in that airspace just about everday for 4 years..It was full of A-10's, the whole time I was there...When I went to parties there we drove right on the field and there were A-10 lined up there all the time..Thats all I know-I also saw F4 Phantoms and f-15's 16's or 18's (I don't remember now) there..all the time..They had 4 armed guards around each of one of those planes at all times- They were the best we had at the time (the f-16 maybe?)and at the time we were in the cold war- The military doesn't publicize when and where their stuff is.. lol

Who's lyin now?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:35 #48 by otisptoadwater

Vice Lord wrote:

otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. Suddenly you have become a fully qualified test pilot on an experimental twin engine jet attack prototype aircraft in the same time frame? At the same time you are not an employee of Fairchild Republic or a qualified A-10 pilot in the USAF.

The scent coming off the holding pens at the Monfort processing plant in Greeley smells less like BS than the crap you are posting.


That was my very first license..I got it when I was 14..Single engine land- Thats how everyone starts out..My first 300 hours were in a Piper Cherokee and I'd rent Censna 150 and 180 when home..Then I flew the Archer, then The Warrior, then the multi engine apache, then..etc..etc...etc... You progess to bigger and bigger equipment. I built and owned a Gyro Copter in Chicago..Flew it all over the place for years..it cost $5500 and took a year to build..Its like a motorcycle in the air, it was a 2 seater and lil precious loved it. They don't work well up here


You didn't answer the question, probably because the only plausible answer is fiction. I'm not surprised, are you secretly Hap Shaughnessy?

[youtube:2bwsahdh]
[/youtube:2bwsahdh]

I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:42 #49 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. .




Ha ha ha ......There is no pilots license that only allows you to fly over land only ... lol Thats not what that means..It means you cant fly a sea plane...

F-ing moron

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Feb 2012 21:46 #50 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Top Military Brass Making More in Pension than Pay

otisptoadwater wrote:

Vice Lord wrote: I logged the hours as PIC time..I have 2.4 hours in the A-10

Proud of that entry


So if you logged the time would you not have a record of the flight and the TAIL NUMBER of the aircraft?! Face it you got caught in a bold face lie and all you done is dance around the facts like a fart in a hot skillet.


Yeahh I have a hand written record of every flight I've ever flown in 8 different log books..Literally thousands of entries..Did you expect me to go dig through old log books for you? lol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.300 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+