- Posts: 2093
- Thank you received: 26
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
otisptoadwater wrote:
Vice Lord wrote: I logged the hours as PIC time..I have 2.4 hours in the A-10
Proud of that entry
So if you logged the time would you not have a record of the flight and the TAIL NUMBER of the aircraft?! Face it you got caught in a bold face lie and all you done is dance around the facts like a fart in a hot skillet.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
navycpo7 wrote:
Vice Lord wrote: I logged the hours as PIC time..I have 2.4 hours in the A-10
Proud of that entry
I also doubt seriously you were PIC OR SIC or much of anything in a A10.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. Suddenly you have become a fully qualified test pilot on an experimental twin engine jet attack prototype aircraft in the same time frame? At the same time you are not an employee of Fairchild Republic or a qualified A-10 pilot in the USAF.
The scent coming off the holding pens at the Monfort processing plant in Greeley smells less like BS than the crap you are posting.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Vice Lord wrote: Ah..I was a 21 or 22 year old college student, so I wasn't in a squadren (?) and they showed me the lever to pull if instructed to eject....Thats it. I was a highly educated and skilled pilot at the time, I was a flight instructor and I think I had a 727 type rating at the time so the A-10 was not complicated in any way. It's a very forgiving aircraft that any novice could fly..
I was being recruited because they obviously thought I had the right stuff...Just like my father.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. Suddenly you have become a fully qualified test pilot on an experimental twin engine jet attack prototype aircraft in the same time frame? At the same time you are not an employee of Fairchild Republic or a qualified A-10 pilot in the USAF.
The scent coming off the holding pens at the Monfort processing plant in Greeley smells less like BS than the crap you are posting.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
navycpo7 wrote:
Vice Lord wrote: Ah..I was a 21 or 22 year old college student, so I wasn't in a squadren (?) and they showed me the lever to pull if instructed to eject....Thats it. I was a highly educated and skilled pilot at the time, I was a flight instructor and I think I had a 727 type rating at the time so the A-10 was not complicated in any way. It's a very forgiving aircraft that any novice could fly..
I was being recruited because they obviously thought I had the right stuff...Just like my father.
OK let me see if I can explain this to you in simple terms. A military aircraft regardless of service, regardless of type of aircraft and regardless of its status unless decommissioned, is in a squadron. The second issue, prior to flying in a military aircraft for a instructional ride or any other type a civilian(you) would have gone through a 1 day or 2 day indoctrination course on the aircraft.
Now here is the kicker, There has never been an A 10 squadron at Patrick AFB. It has never been a base with combat aircraft assigned there. There were other things going on there, which my first ship while I was onboard did there and off the coast there. Patrick AFB was and still is part of space wing. There is also a Air Force Rescue Sqd there that flies HC-130P/N "King" variant of the C-130 Hercules and HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter. The Base use to be a Naval Air Station during WWII supporting seaplanes. That is it. It is more of a missle test facility along with a few others things these days. Ya really should quit lying about this type stuff.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Vice Lord wrote:
otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. Suddenly you have become a fully qualified test pilot on an experimental twin engine jet attack prototype aircraft in the same time frame? At the same time you are not an employee of Fairchild Republic or a qualified A-10 pilot in the USAF.
The scent coming off the holding pens at the Monfort processing plant in Greeley smells less like BS than the crap you are posting.
That was my very first license..I got it when I was 14..Single engine land- Thats how everyone starts out..My first 300 hours were in a Piper Cherokee and I'd rent Censna 150 and 180 when home..Then I flew the Archer, then The Warrior, then the multi engine apache, then..etc..etc...etc... You progess to bigger and bigger equipment. I built and owned a Gyro Copter in Chicago..Flew it all over the place for years..it cost $5500 and took a year to build..Its like a motorcycle in the air, it was a 2 seater and lil precious loved it. They don't work well up here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
otisptoadwater wrote: VL, The scan of the license you posted (and who knows if it is really yours) states the bearer was qualified for a single engine aircraft on instruments and only over land. .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
otisptoadwater wrote:
Vice Lord wrote: I logged the hours as PIC time..I have 2.4 hours in the A-10
Proud of that entry
So if you logged the time would you not have a record of the flight and the TAIL NUMBER of the aircraft?! Face it you got caught in a bold face lie and all you done is dance around the facts like a fart in a hot skillet.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.