Rush Limbaugh Apologizes For His "Slut" Remarks.

If by wife, you mean young drunk girls down at Cactus Jack's,then you are closer to the mark.

CinnamonGirl wrote: Wicked, you are way sluttier than I am.

I used to be. Getting old sucks, can't rock the bikini, or night club hoochie-mama outfits like I used to. I can outlast any 20 year old you throw at me though!

Hmmm, a 285Bound slut walk...I like it!

Kate wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Thus, equating the coverage of Viagra to address an existing medical condition and the coverage of contraception which is used to create a medical condition is an attempt to equate an apple with an orange.

Let me see if I can paraphrase what you said.

Insurance companies should pay for a prescription for a medical condition so that a man can participate in a voluntary sexual activity. Insurance companies should not pay for a prescription for a woman which can prevent a medical condition that is a result of that same voluntary sexual activity.

Is that about the sum of your opinion?

Yes, the big difference there is that we have a choice and make it, consciously. Those poor men are just suffering and need help. How dare we attempt to take so much control of our lives.

Wicked wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote: Wicked, you are way sluttier than I am.

I used to be. Getting old sucks, can't rock the bikini, or night club hoochie-mama outfits like I used to. I can outlast any 20 year old you throw at me though!

Hmmm, a 285Bound slut walk...I like it!

Kate wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Thus, equating the coverage of Viagra to address an existing medical condition and the coverage of contraception which is used to create a medical condition is an attempt to equate an apple with an orange.

Let me see if I can paraphrase what you said.

Insurance companies should pay for a prescription for a medical condition so that a man can participate in a voluntary sexual activity. Insurance companies should not pay for a prescription for a woman which can prevent a medical condition that is a result of that same voluntary sexual activity.

Is that about the sum of your opinion?

Yes, the big difference there is that we have a choice and make it, consciously. Those poor men are just suffering and need help. How dare we attempt to take so much control of our lives.

Maybe they should be putting an aspirin between THEIR knees? rofllol

Keep government out of our lives and put it into theirs. No wonder people have a hard time taking them seriously.

I'd prefer if they'd keep it delicately pinched between their teeth.

Damn, it look like I picked the wrong week to be off line.

[youtube:3jc6ip4q][/youtube:3jc6ip4q]

I skimmed this thread and it looks like a target rich environment. If you like to make a difference rather than just slinging mud, there is a lot going on at the old Platte Canyon grill , which will be the new site of the Peace Shelter's resale shop. I did a little painting there last week but had no idea that there was so much left to do.

If you can cut dry wall, pound a nail, paint, hang a door, tape or mud, sweep a floor............

Teabaggers.

Kate wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: If you are asking that the insurance companies be required to cover prescriptions for existing medical conditions in a consistent manner regardless of what the prescription is, I will absolutely support that. I recognize that a prescription which can be used for contraceptive purposes has other medical indications for treating existing medical conditions such as heavy or irregular menstruation, hormonal mood changes, growths on ovaries and others. I fully agree that a person seeking to treat such a condition should have their prescription covered in an identical manner as one who has been prescribed Viagra to address their medical condition. When prescribed to induce sterility, however, the prescription is not being used to treat a medical condition, it is being used to create one. Thus, equating the coverage of Viagra to address an existing medical condition and the coverage of contraception which is used to create a medical condition is an attempt to equate an apple with an orange.

Let me see if I can paraphrase what you said.

Insurance companies should pay for a prescription for a medical condition so that a man can participate in a voluntary sexual activity. Insurance companies should not pay for a prescription for a woman which can prevent a medical condition that is a result of that same voluntary sexual activity.

Is that about the sum of your opinion?

If one holds that fertility is an abnormal condition for a woman rather than a normal one that might be a fair summation of the opinion that was expressed. Is this the source of our disconnect Kate? Do you feel that fertility indicates that there is a medical problem which the medical community needs to address and fix if at all possible so that normal function, which would be infertility, can be restored?

OK I looked at her she has to PAY for sex.
So Slut is out of the ? unless dudes like some on here add______ are desperate.

Not all of us can be charming and gorgeous as ME,,, or VL.