BearMtnHIB wrote: I don't "coast". You might be thinking about yourself, or someone you know.
I'm earning my own fortune- and if I wind up with some additional money from the family, then that's just a bonus. In the meanwhile- I'm not counting on anything from anyone.
And if it does happen- it'll probably be too late in life for me to spend it on ferrari's and wild women.
And that would be my advise to anyone who may have come from a wealthy family- never count on that wealth.
My father could change his mind the day before he dies and give it all to the demoncratic party (highly unlikely!).
He hates looters and deadbeats- and welfare state Liberals.
You have been kissing his ass your whole life, i hope he leaves everything to the charity of his choice rather than a suck up like you.
More bitter?
not me but BM insulted my Dad because he worked in a factory. Elitist loser. deserves what he gets.
Sorry to interupt jmc while s/he is honing their uber ugly chops, but for LJ I happened to see this go by today.
It seems to me that 26 weeks is a long wait for coronary bypass surgery.
The 2012 report card issued Tuesday showed no change in grades for the national average.
That means good news for cancer patients waiting for radiation therapy and those waiting for a coronary bypass.
They both received an “A” grade, meaning that at least 80 per cent of the people requiring those treatments received them within the benchmark set by governments — four weeks for radiation and 26 weeks for heart surgery.
And further (farther?) down the article:
Many of the benchmarks — including those set by the government — measure the amount of time patients have to wait between visiting a specialist and receiving whatever treatment that specialist decided they need.
The report notes that patients measure this time differently — beginning from the onset of illness — and that it can often take far longer to find a family doctor or wait for an appointment with a specialist than it does to receive treatment.
“Waiting for specialist treatment is really just the tip of the iceberg, and when you add up all the waiting periods endured by patients, the total wait for care can be very lengthy,” Simpson said in the release.
not me but BM insulted my Dad because he worked in a factory. Elitist loser.
Oh yea? Show me where I did that-
Your lying out your ass.
not wasting my time, you look up when you bragged about your Dad being a "Coal Company CEO" and I was just a factory workers son. I , unlike you made it on my own. Isn't this what you pretend to admire. phony?
Like most of you 3rd basers, thinking you hit a home run, what a bunch of BS
Mary Scott wrote: Sorry to interupt jmc while s/he is honing their uber ugly chops, but for LJ I happened to see this go by today.
It seems to me that 26 weeks is a long wait for coronary bypass surgery.
The 2012 report card issued Tuesday showed no change in grades for the national average.
That means good news for cancer patients waiting for radiation therapy and those waiting for a coronary bypass.
They both received an “A” grade, meaning that at least 80 per cent of the people requiring those treatments received them within the benchmark set by governments — four weeks for radiation and 26 weeks for heart surgery.
And further (farther?) down the article:
Many of the benchmarks — including those set by the government — measure the amount of time patients have to wait between visiting a specialist and receiving whatever treatment that specialist decided they need.
The report notes that patients measure this time differently — beginning from the onset of illness — and that it can often take far longer to find a family doctor or wait for an appointment with a specialist than it does to receive treatment.
“Waiting for specialist treatment is really just the tip of the iceberg, and when you add up all the waiting periods endured by patients, the total wait for care can be very lengthy,” Simpson said in the release.
I'm soooo not interested in your partisan "statistics" when I personally know enough people who live there who say it's a lie... But continue on... I could watch the Rightie bullsh*t for hours.
Democracy4Sale wrote: I'm soooo not interested in your partisan "statistics" when I personally know enough people who live there who say it's a lie... But continue on... I could watch the Rightie bullsh*t for hours.
Whoops, sorry. I should have paid attention to my own advice. There are some that you just can't talk to. My bad.
Democracy4Sale wrote: I'm soooo not interested in your partisan "statistics" when I personally know enough people who live there who say it's a lie... But continue on... I could watch the Rightie bullsh*t for hours.
Whoops, sorry. I should have paid attention to my own advice. There are some that you just can't talk to. My bad.
<
Yep, LJ only believes facts when the Huffington Post tells her to.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
More bitter?
