Mitt guilty of felony perjury?

I blame robo-signing!

Note...

As the New York Times reports Monday (7-16-2012), there was an expectation at first that Romney might return to active management of Bain so he did not sever his ownership ties right away -- an additional reason why his name was not struck from documents for a while. The Times account goes on to say there is no evidence that during this interim he was actively engaged in managing the firm.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/us/po ... =1&_r=1&hp

Note: When the call came from the Olympics that February, Romney met with his partners and said he and wife, Ann, had concluded that they had to do this and as difficult as it would be for the partnership, he had to leave in a matter of several days... So, as the company slowly unwound its records, some papers from Bain continued to list Romney even though he had left the partnership.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/12/politics/ ... index.html

Note: FactCheck.org, a respected website that nails candidates for inaccuracies, earlier investigated the whole issue of Romney's departure and reached a conclusion that he was telling the truth. Last week, little noticed by Romney's critics, FactCheck went back, reviewed the evidence again, and based on what we know so far, reaffirmed its earlier conclusion. FactCheck's recent article was co-written by a man who was once a top investigative journalist for CNN.

http://factcheck.org/2012/07/romneys-ba ... onclusion/

Last week, in another article that critics tend to ignore, Fortune reported that it had obtained confidential documents that Bain gave to prospective investors in advance of that seventh round offering in 2000. The prospectus is the way a company such as Bain informs possible investors who will manage their money. The prospectus listed 18 managers at Bain who would have responsibility. Romney's name was not among them.

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/07/ ... bain-exit/

Note: As long as fairness is the standard, it would be reassuring if some of the harshest critics of Romney and Bain would acknowledge their own biases. And for goodness sake, will the Obama campaign please withdraw its heavy suggestion that Mitt Romney could well have committed a felony? That was an injustice to both Romney and the president. ( David Gergen is a senior political analyst for CNN and has been an adviser to four presidents. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he is a professor of public service and director of the Center for Public Leadership at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.)

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/16/opinion/g ... ?hpt=hp_c1

Note: This threads topic is "Mitt guilty of felony perjury?" Note: NO.

If he retired retroactively, does that mean he has to give three year's worth of salary back?

Democracy4Sale wrote: If he retired retroactively, does that mean he has to give three year's worth of salary back?

Note: This threads topic is "Mitt guilty of felony perjury?" Note: NO. (your lies LJ have been laid bare)

It is still to be determined. It is obvious that Mitt is guilty of misleading as to his role with Bain during 1999 - 2002. He was clearly involved and "responsible" for the activities of Bain during that time period.

Something the Dog Said wrote: It is still to be determined. It is obvious that Mitt is guilty of misleading as to his role with Bain during 1999 - 2002. He was clearly involved and "responsible" for the activities of Bain during that time period.

typical deflection by conservatives to run from their candidate.

Something the Dog Said wrote: typical deflection by conservatives to run from their candidate.

Typical guilty until proven innocent mentality from a liberal who thinks he knows it all.

And what about your candidate dog? What great accomplishment can he run on and what can we expect as far as economic policy in the next 4 years that will be different than the last 4? Or maybe his plan is to just stay the course with a sprinkling of new taxes.

Ryt_Rick wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: typical deflection by conservatives to run from their candidate.

Typical guilty until proven innocent mentality from a liberal who thinks he knows it all.

And what about your candidate dog? What great accomplishment can he run on and what can we expect as far as economic policy in the next 4 years that will be different than the last 4? Or maybe his plan is to just stay the course with a sprinkling of new taxes.

feel free to start your own thread, this is on the Mittster and his lies. Deflect on your own thread.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Ryt_Rick wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: typical deflection by conservatives to run from their candidate.

Typical guilty until proven innocent mentality from a liberal who thinks he knows it all.

And what about your candidate dog? What great accomplishment can he run on and what can we expect as far as economic policy in the next 4 years that will be different than the last 4? Or maybe his plan is to just stay the course with a sprinkling of new taxes.

feel free to start your own thread, this is on the Mittster and his lies. Deflect on your own thread.

Look, if your a poster, you didn't do this on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be my thread because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart posters out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else at posting the thread. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there helping you with this thread. You didn't do it on your own. (channeling Obama).