One More Massacre

21 Jul 2012 12:36 #61 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic One More Massacre
I think that it is a bad idea.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 12:47 #62 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic One More Massacre
Why couldn't you have said that in the first place? The attack was unnecessary.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 13:18 #63 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic One More Massacre

Democracy4Sale wrote: Why couldn't you have said that in the first place? The attack was unnecessary.

As is this.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 15:27 #64 by cydl
Replied by cydl on topic One More Massacre

Raees wrote: We should be really proud -- we're #1 in ...

1. The number of guns per capita. 90 guns for every 100 people. Yemen is a distant second at 61.

Number of firearms in America - between 223,000,000 and 290,000,000 (Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institue of International Studies, 2008)

Raees wrote: 2. In gun violence. Nearly 100,000 people get shot every year. That's 270 people a day and 87 dead because of gun violence every day. That's seven Colorado shootings per day!

54% of gun shot deaths are suicides (80% in Canada). Numerious studies have shown that the presence of absence of a firearm does not change the overall (i.e., gun plus non-gun) suicide rate - National Center for Health Statistics, average rates for years 1981 through 2003, and Death Involving Firearms, Kathryn Wilkins, Health Report vol. 16 no 4, Statistics Canada

And a for daily deaths: "25% of this unreliable figure includes "direct war deaths," and another 14% are suicides. The bulk of the rest come from violence-prone and nearl lawless localities. All published figures are estimates based on incomplete information. The definition of "gun" seems to be very broad: "...revolvers and self-loading pistols, rifles and carbines, assault rifles, sub-machine guns, and light machine guns." Light weapons are "...heavy machine guns, hand-held under-barrel and mounted grenade launchers, portable antitank and anti-aircraft guns, recoilless rifles, protable launchers of anti-tank and anti-aircraft missile systems, and mortars of less than 100mm caliber." - (my note: just try to find these at a dealer on gun show) - IANSA, 2006 Small Arms Survey.

Raees wrote: 3. The number of child deaths because of guns. Nearly 3,000 kids are killed by guns every year.

This "statistic" includes "children" up to age 19 or 24, depending upon the source. Most violent crime is committed by males ages 16-24, these numbers end up including adult gang members dying during criminal activity. 339 children (age 14 and under) died from gunfire in all of 2006, or fewer than one per day. This includes homicides and accidents combined. - CDC National Vital Statistics System Report R00.1-Y89.9, 2006 and FBI Uniform Crime Statistics, 1997. For contrast: 1917 children die each day from malaria around the world and 15 men, women, and children per day are murdered by a convicted felon in government supervised parole/probation programs in the US. - UN. World Health Organization and US Bureau of Justice Statistics. (my note: OK, I probably should not use UN information; I don't trust them any further than I could throw them, but what the hey)

Raees wrote: And gun manufacturers cheer on! What is their response to all of this? They send out their Republican minions to say that the answer is more guns. If only other people in the crowd had guns, then everything would have been alright. Yes, because in that dark, smoke filled theater if there were more than two or three shooters everyone would have known who was the original shooter and less people would have been shot, right?

How would the third gunmen know if the second gunmen were part of the team that was shooting the place up (like Klebold and Harris at Columbine) or one of the guys trying to prevent it? Let alone the fourth or the fifth gunmen, let alone the cops who show up.


I think you're misconstruing here. The answer is not more guns per se, but allowing citizens the human right of self-defense. BTW, Cinemark cinemas are "gun free zones", so how could this have happened? Psycho obviously did not read and obey the sign at the entrance. The question of whether or not a legally armed citizen would have been able to do anything in this situation is questionable; between the darkness, smoke, and many patrons in full lizard-brain stampede coupled with the fact that the Psycho was armoured, I think not. I personally think I would have been lying on the floor playing dead whether I was armed or not. But I wonder if Psycho would have chosen that venue if it were not a "gun free zone". Hmmmm....schools are "gun free zones" too....

BTW, did you know that, according to the most recent FBI statistics (last year, I believe) firearms were used to thwart approximatly 6000 crimes per day? The vast majority of those actions did not involve a shot being fired.

In 1911 Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917 approximately 1.5 million Armenians, deprived of the right to defend themselves, were rounded up and killed.

In 1929 the USSR established gun control. From 1929 to 1953 approximately 20 million dissidents were rounded up and killed.

In 1938 Germany established gun control. From 1939 to 1945 over 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, mentally ill, union leaders, Catholics, and others were rounded up and killed.

In 1935 China established gun control. Between 1948 and 1952 over 20 million dissidents were rounded up and killed.

In 1956 Cambodia established gun control. From 1975 to 1977 over one million people - the "intellegensia" - were rounded up and killed.

In 1964 Guatemala established gun control. From 1964 to 1981 over 100,000 Mayans were rounded up and killed.

In 1970 Uganda established gun control. That decade over 300,000 Christians were rounded up and killed.

Recently Venezuela established gun control. Let's see what ol' Hugo does with that.

And you may argue that this can't happen in the good 'ol USA - no one will be rounded up here. Well, tell that to the Japanese. And another question: Why do politicians and celebrities work so hard to deprive us of our right to self-defense when they are surrounded by armed body guards? Let ask Diane Feinstein, shall we (did you know she has a CCW?).

“Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." - Mahatma Gandhi

Molon Lave.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 16:16 #65 by ScienceChic
Replied by ScienceChic on topic One More Massacre
This post on George Takei's Facebook Wall pretty much sums it up for me:


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater

I'm pissed off that a PhD in neuroscience would target anyone, but especially our fellow Geek Fan-Brothers and -Sisters. To kill a 6 year old, who was there with her family to just enjoy a movie angers me to a point where I want to show no mercy. When it makes me cry reading that her mother is possibly paralyzed, in and out of consciousness, and doesn't even know her own daughter is dead, I can only imagine what her reaction will be when she finds out and it breaks my heart all over again. I am angry because I put myself in her place, knowing I have, and will again, take my own kids to premieres just like that one and I refuse to let fear of what could be rule my life, yet know that because of this incident it will always cross my mind and put that niggling fear in my brain when I'm there and for that I blame him for intruding on even a small portion of happiness with my family. It doesn't matter to me whether he's Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Socialist, Green, Black, White, Asian, Mexican, Russian, German, South African, Chilean, Atheist, Christian, Muslim, Lutheran, only child, orphaned from birth, sibling to 19 others, heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual, suffering from anxiety, erectile dysfunction, extreme shyness or extreme arrogance, pimples, or perfectly healthy, rich, or poor, it comes down to he made a conscious choice, as evidenced by his pre-planning, to end the lives of humans he had no right to end and I hope he suffers in the lowest rings of his own hell for a long, long, long time. Yes, guns made it a hell of a lot easier to kill more people in a shorter span of time, but that's not the root of the problem - he obviously could just as easily have tossed bombs instead. There is no quick and easy fix for the human traits of primitive and inappropriate emotional and physical responses to whatever s*** he was dealing with, but that's what needs to be dealt with. Increased vigilance and action on everyone's part of anyone they know, needs to be on the table for discussion. How many people in your life, friends or family, have you thought could have been someone to do something like this, and how many times did you report that to someone (counselor, teacher, boss, parent, etc) who could/would do something about it? I know I didn't and should have.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 16:17 #66 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic One More Massacre

cydl wrote:

Raees wrote: We should be really proud -- we're #1 in ...

1. The number of guns per capita. 90 guns for every 100 people. Yemen is a distant second at 61.


Number of firearms in America - between 223,000,000 and 290,000,000 (Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institue of International Studies, 2008)


With a population of 311 million and 290 million guns, that's about 90 guns for every 100 people.

You're welcome.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 17:30 #67 by Martin Ent Inc
Replied by Martin Ent Inc on topic One More Massacre
That's a good #.
As in all politics, the ones without will want the ones with to protect their ass when the shit hits the fan,,, and it is a coming.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 17:38 #68 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic One More Massacre

Raees wrote:

cydl wrote:

Raees wrote: We should be really proud -- we're #1 in ...

1. The number of guns per capita. 90 guns for every 100 people. Yemen is a distant second at 61.


Number of firearms in America - between 223,000,000 and 290,000,000 (Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institue of International Studies, 2008)


With a population of 311 million and 290 million guns, that's about 90 guns for every 100 people.

You're welcome.

amazing considering how the murder rate continues to fall as more guns keep being bought.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 17:51 #69 by Martin Ent Inc
Replied by Martin Ent Inc on topic One More Massacre
AMAZINGLY CNN just posted that the murder rate, crime rate etc has dropped alot since 2007 but gun purchases has risen ridiculously.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jul 2012 18:16 #70 by Hoot Owl
Replied by Hoot Owl on topic One More Massacre

"Raees wrote: With a population of 311 million and 290 million guns, that's about 90 guns for every 100 people.

You're welcome.


Statistics ....
I have zero guns I doubt I am 1 in 10. Some of you are collectors. Raees can you provide a better statistic? How many guns are useable and in use? How do you count guns, useable guns and collectors pieces? If you have 20 guns and I have zero, statistically how many guns do I have?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.280 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+