Raees wrote: Good! The more people who vote, the better.
But in all honesty, that's what it was like LAST time and look who won.
Sure wasn't the Democrats who won the last election - seems to me Obama described the last election as a shellacking for his party. Not that it encouraged him to alter his radical agenda at all in the time that has elapsed since.
Raees wrote: Good! The more people who vote, the better.
But in all honesty, that's what it was like LAST time and look who won.
Sure wasn't the Democrats who won the last election - seems to me Obama described the last election as a shellacking for his party. Not that it encouraged him to alter his radical agenda at all in the time that has elapsed since.
Are you that dense that you didn't realize I was referring to the last presidential election?
I'm hearing that the "kiss-in" isn't going as well as expected today. Perhaps they should step it up a notch- start using more tongue, maybe grab ahold of some packages or somthing.
Raees wrote: Are you that dense that you didn't realize I was referring to the last presidential election?
Are you so dense that you didn't realize what you were referring to is essentially irrelevant in the current political climate? Are you so dense as to not realize that the one "accomplishment" Obama wishes the electorate to remember most about his first term, the ACA, is more likely to cost him votes come November than secure them given that the majority of the citizens of the States wanted SCOTUS to rule it was unconstitutional? What other accomplishments does he have to run on? Unemployment, which his SwindleUs was supposed to keep below 8%, hasn't been below 8% since. He's racked up more debt in 4 years than Bush did in 8. The ACA is the largest tax increase in raw dollars ever levied against the people of the union. It's been 3 years since the recession ended and all Obama can manage to do is try to avoid talking about the weakest recovery the union has ever endured while his sycophants keep trying to make some hay out of tax returns. The likelihood of the Democrats maintaining their majority is the Senate is about 40% as of the middle of June. The likelihood of the Democrats picking up 50+ seats in the House is closer to 30%. Romney has a better chance of winning the election than the Democrats do of having a majority in either house at the start of the 113th Congress.
