Ready for Gulf War III? Just in time for November...

lionshead2010 wrote:

archer wrote: Obama was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and conservatives said he didn't have enough foreign policy experience. Romney was a one term governor and has zero foreign policy experience beyond shipping jobs and his money overseas and now conservatives think that is just ducky.

I still disagree with the characterization of Mr. Romney having zero foreign policy experience. The governor of any state interacts internationally concerning commerce. I don't have time to cite exact dates and times of then Governor Romney's travels and hosting of foreign dignitaries or business people.....but I'm certain it happened when he governed Mass.

Then there is the small matter of organizing the Winter Olympics in Utah. The Olympics are a foreign affair and Mr. Romney did just fine in organizing an event that was heading for the shoals.

As for President Obama's "vast" foreign affairs experience, I would have to ask how all that is playing out for us as a nation today? Where is all the love and respect I heard the left promise? I'm just not seeing it. He may have extraordinary foreign policy experience but I don't see evidence of that experience being applied for the good of our nation.

I know you are in the can for Mr. Obama and can't see it....but someday history will tell the real story.

Mmm, Rmoney's experience in "saving" the winter olympics was to seek and get the largest bailout from the US taxpayer for any Olympic game.

Is that the "experience" that you seek? Really, the most foreign experience that Rmoney has is visiting his offshore accounts.

At least Romney is in tight with our biggest ally, the Brits.

Oh wait.

If there was ever a better expression of the covetous nature of Owebama and "progressives" in general, than this latest offering from Dog is, I have yet to see it.

Rolling out the old ad homenim now, are we?

Raees wrote: At least Romney is in tight with our biggest ally, the Brits.

Oh wait.

Obama didn't exactly get off on the right foot with our Euro allies either. Talking about this next century being Asia's and Europe being the past.

RMoney still needs a passport to go visit his money....

FredHayek wrote:

Raees wrote: At least Romney is in tight with our biggest ally, the Brits.

Oh wait.

Obama didn't exactly get off on the right foot with our Euro allies either. Talking about this next century being Asia's and Europe being the past.

Which part of that did he get wrong?

RMoney 'foreign relations" on display:

English 'United' Against Mitt Romney, David Cameron Reported To Have Said

It's a good thing for Mitt Romney the English do not have a vote in American elections, as they are "united" against him becoming the next president of the United States, David Cameron is reported to have said.

Speaking to the BBC's Marr programme on Sunday, American film producer Harvey Weinstein claimed the prime minister made the observation in the wake of the Republican candidate's gaffe-prone visit to London in July.

"Mitt Romney has that unique distinction of uniting all of England against him with his various remarks," Cameron is said to have told a group of people including Weinstein.

Romney's visit to Britain in July on the eve of the Olympics was largely overshadowed by his questioning of London's readiness to host the Games.

The comments led Cameron to rebuke the presidential candidate by poking fun at Romney's stewardship of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09 ... r=Politics

Wow... Our closest ally... And he can't even visit them without it turning into a blooper-reel.

I just love that the progressives are playing the "experience" card when it comes to their man. It's precious.

My, my what a difference four years makes eh?

I'm still confident that the Romney-Ryan team can do a better job with both domestic and foreign policy than the current administration. Clint Eastwood had it right when he was talking to the empty chair at the RNC.

It's time for Mr. Obama to go. If your employee had failed on promises made, and you were objective, you would let him go too. It's okay to let go guys. Just let him go.....relax and let him go.

So you will be voting against the House Republicans? Remember their laser like focus on jobs, jobs, jobs?