LadyJazzer wrote: 47.5 % ... And since that number was even higher on the losing side when Bush got his second term, we KNOW how that worked out for the people that didn't vote for him...
As you guys were so found of pointing out in 2010, (and in 2004), "Elections have consequences"... If you want to think back on how you treated those wins as a "mandate" to screw the people that didn't vote for your candidate, the cries of "ignoring the will of the [47.5%]" ring a little hollow... Oh well, it's probably the 47% that are all "victims" and "takers" anyway... I guess you'll have to live with that for another 2-4 years...
We have a mandate!!!
[/b]
On Libya, 54% of the country is dissatisfied with the administration's response to the Benghazi attack
, with only four in ten saying they're satisfied with the way the White House handled the matter.
LadyJazzer wrote: Oh, I think he's overcoming the 8 years of GOTP failure and recessions and obstructionism pretty well, all things considered...
Did I mention that 52.5% voted AGAINST your ideas...and you LOST...?
Not if you look at the numbers. Under Obama seven times more people are on food stamps than Barack has created jobs for. Household wealth has declined for the middle class and increased for the upper class. Are you sure BHO isn't a Republican in sheep's clothing?
Want to know which administration has been worse for minorities? "W" or "BHO"? Barack, more minorities are unemployed under Obama than Bush.
Team Obama, all talk, no action.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Not if you look at the numbers. Under Obama seven times more people are on food stamps than Barack has created jobs for. Household wealth has declined for the middle class and increased for the upper class. Are you sure BHO isn't a Republican in sheep's clothing?
Want to know which administration has been worse for minorities? "W" or "BHO"? Barack, more minorities are unemployed under Obama than Bush.
Could that possibly be because W left the great recession for BHO to deal with? Hmmm.
2wlady wrote: Could that possibly be because W left the great recession for BHO to deal with? Hmmm.
Nope, sorry. Now Obama is the previous administration that we can blame everything for. If we're going to start skipping around with our blame willy nilly the whole political argument structure will come crashing down like a house of cards.
"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln
Obama hands are tied, he can't achieve anything because the specter of "W" haunts him.
