FredHayek wrote: You said you didn't think enough was spent on stimulus.
Only in your mind would that translate to desiring a higher deficit and wanting bridges to nowhere. Logic is not exactly your strong sit.
:faint: Tax revenues are down. You want to increase spending, so how do you plan to do that without increasing debt levels? Who isn't logical?
Or are you saying the stimulus plans negotiated between Pelosi and Reid were more about fattening the wallets of their buddies than providing jobs for Americans?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: You said you didn't think enough was spent on stimulus.
Only in your mind would that translate to desiring a higher deficit and wanting bridges to nowhere. Logic is not exactly your strong sit.
:faint: Tax revenues are down. You want to increase spending, so how do you plan to do that without increasing debt levels? Who isn't logical?
Or are you saying the stimulus plans negotiated between Pelosi and Reid were more about fattening the wallets of their buddies than providing jobs for Americans?
Are you implying that the Republicans who tell us that revenue will increase when jobs come back are wrong? A larger stimulus I believe would create jobs which in turn would increase revenue which would help reduce the deficit. There is an old financial saying....it takes money to make money.
