The bit bucket

19 Mar 2013 23:38 #131 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket
It's OK Bob, it's your forum, you get to do what you want.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Mar 2013 23:39 #132 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket
Who knew we had a moderator wannabe among us?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Mar 2013 06:09 #133 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic The bit bucket

archer wrote: 4 people die in Bengazi, the conservatives want answers and action......but 20 children die in Sandy Hook, and they want nothing done. Priorities.

Maybe they don't think the proposed solutions are worth the loss of freedoms? If we restricted automobiles to 30 miles per hour it would save thousands of people but would it be worth it?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 May 2013 15:42 #134 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The bit bucket
This should have been posted in the courthouse so the lefties could wiggle and squirm to try and justify this crap.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 May 2013 18:10 #135 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The bit bucket

archer wrote:

Rick wrote: This should have been posted in the courthouse so the lefties could wiggle and squirm to try and justify this crap.

Why would you claim lefties would try to justify this? It's obviously wrong, they had no business doing it, and I'm glad to see them come clean.

This was more aimed at LJ, the tea party hate queen and religious bigot.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 May 2013 18:29 #136 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The bit bucket

archer wrote:

Rick wrote:

archer wrote:

Rick wrote: This should have been posted in the courthouse so the lefties could wiggle and squirm to try and justify this crap.

Why would you claim lefties would try to justify this? It's obviously wrong, they had no business doing it, and I'm glad to see them come clean.

This was more aimed at LJ, the tea party hate queen and religious bigot.

Maybe it's time to retire that broad brush.

Do you really need me to post the evidence? Sometimes I wonder if you and LJ are the same person.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 May 2013 20:21 #137 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic The bit bucket

archer wrote: There are a number of these political groups complaining that their applications for non profit status are on hold.... Perhaps they have been unable to prove that they qualify. I have a real problem with non profits paying millions for political ads on TV, and so should the IRS.


:wave: So instead of following the laws of the land, Archer and the IRS have decreed how political campaigns will be taxed. Sounds as Nixonian as your esteemed leader Obama.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 May 2013 20:36 #138 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket
I have no idea what you just posted.... The are certain criteria for being a non profit, are you suggesting there shouldn't be? It isn't me, or the IRS, it's the law.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 May 2013 20:37 #139 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The bit bucket

Rick wrote:

archer wrote:

Rick wrote:

archer wrote:

Rick wrote: This should have been posted in the courthouse so the lefties could wiggle and squirm to try and justify this crap.

Why would you claim lefties would try to justify this? It's obviously wrong, they had no business doing it, and I'm glad to see them come clean.

This was more aimed at LJ, the tea party hate queen and religious bigot.

Maybe it's time to retire that broad brush.

Do you really need me to post the evidence? Sometimes I wonder if you and LJ are the same person.

I understand why this post went to the bucket... those two letters have become very offensive around here. I'll try to use "witch" instead next time.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 May 2013 20:49 #140 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket

Rick wrote:

Rick wrote:

archer wrote:

Rick wrote:

archer wrote:

Rick wrote: This should have been posted in the courthouse so the lefties could wiggle and squirm to try and justify this crap.

Why would you claim lefties would try to justify this? It's obviously wrong, they had no business doing it, and I'm glad to see them come clean.

This was more aimed at LJ, the tea party hate queen and religious bigot.

Maybe it's time to retire that broad brush.

Do you really need me to post the evidence? Sometimes I wonder if you and LJ are the same person.

I understand why this post went to the bucket... those two letters have become very offensive around here. I'll try to use "witch" instead next time.

Why not just move on from the hate and vitriol? Your posts can no longet be explained away as a response to LJ, you have become the antagonist. Seriously, you have become what you hate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.168 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+