The bit bucket

18 Feb 2013 13:27 #101 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket
Interesting, Fred can post his opinions in the main thread with impunity, but my opinion of his posts and what he may, or may not, know about poverty in urban settings is not allowed. The Bob's conservative safe haven is alive and well.

carry on....................

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 13:29 #102 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket

Arlen wrote: Quite a lot of the "poverty" is bogus. There are very many couples who live together, outside of marriage, with their children from previous relationships. Both parents work and file their income tax forms as single head of household with the IRS. Their combined incomes would definitely disqualify them to be classified in the poverty class, but separately they qualify. So they get food stamps, free school lunches, and all sorts of public assistance. And they vote for their entitlements. I would suspect that many of them are members of these forums.


I believe that is a form of slander against some members of this forum with NO PROOF whatsoever. But I suspect Bob will let your posts remain.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 13:34 #103 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic The bit bucket
Well done, archer. Now, address the substance of what I have posted.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 13:42 #104 by Something the Dog Said

Arlen wrote: Quite a lot of the "poverty" is bogus. There are very many couples who live together, outside of marriage, with their children from previous relationships. Both parents work and file their income tax forms as single head of household with the IRS. Their combined incomes would definitely disqualify them to be classified in the poverty class, but separately they qualify. So they get food stamps, free school lunches, and all sorts of public assistance. How else do you suppose that 1 or 4 children are on food stamps? And the parents vote for their entitlements. I would suspect that many of them are members of these forums.

Nope that is absolutely a false statement meant to intentionally mislead posters and distort from the truth.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 13:46 #105 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic The bit bucket
Nope, that is what is happening in the U.S. today after the destruction of marriage. Everyone is working the angles.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 13:51 #106 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket

Arlen wrote: Well done, archer. Now, address the substance of what I have posted.


There was no substance in what you posted.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 16:28 #107 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic The bit bucket
It is odd that Bob let your post remain, archer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 16:52 - 18 Feb 2013 18:05 #108 by archer
Replied by archer on topic The bit bucket

Arlen wrote: It is odd that Bob let your post remain, archer.

Perhaps he let it stay because it quoted your post....that way he could both move your post to appear even handed and yet let your slander remain. Pretty clever actually. Yeah, I know, I could just edit mine and remove yours altogether.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 18:29 #109 by Something the Dog Said

archer wrote:

Arlen wrote: Quite a lot of the "poverty" is bogus. There are very many couples who live together, outside of marriage, with their children from previous relationships. Both parents work and file their income tax forms as single head of household with the IRS. Their combined incomes would definitely disqualify them to be classified in the poverty class, but separately they qualify. So they get food stamps, free school lunches, and all sorts of public assistance. And they vote for their entitlements. I would suspect that many of them are members of these forums.


I believe that is a form of slander against some members of this forum with NO PROOF whatsoever. But I suspect Bob will let your posts remain.

It is interesting that here in Bob's World, posts are removed for pointing outright lies and slander while the lies and slander are allowed to stay. For example, one would have to be incredibly stupid to believe that it is possible for two individuals, receiving separate W-2 forms from their respective employers could then combine both W-2 forms in order to file as a single head of household. Or is that such statements were obviously meant to distort the truth and render this thread absolutely worthless? And then those statements are used to slander members of the forum. But here in Bob's World, such distinctions are meaningless as long as they are by conservatives.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Feb 2013 18:55 #110 by Blazer Bob
Replied by Blazer Bob on topic The bit bucket

archer wrote:

Arlen wrote: It is odd that Bob let your post remain, archer.

Perhaps he let it stay because it quoted your post....that way he could both move your post to appear even handed and yet let your slander remain. Pretty clever actually. Yeah, I know, I could just edit mine and remove yours altogether.



:rofllol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+