In case anyone cares...

jmc wrote: I could post the "contract". I will wait hoping they get an agreement.

Who's side are you on?

Vice Lord wrote:

jmc wrote: I could post the "contract". I will wait hoping they get an agreement.

Who's side are you on?

Not yours, simple contract dispute, it never should have escalated.
The contract is clear, I will post it if there is no resolution.

Vice Lord wrote:

homeagain wrote: VL YOUR credibility has been in question from the time you posted your analogy of KFC and what
a FRANCHISE is.......this is NOT a franchise, but yet you vehemently posted that it was.....what
is the REAL definition of an affiliate......APPARENTLY the misconception stems from the words
franchise and/or affiliate......the MACRO view is CG opted to handle this misunderstanding via
a PUBLIC declaration of her intent (creating a "twin" website).....LACK of a forward thinking
action.....(it WILL be proven to be detrimental to her/her associates/her partners/her adv.customers......because EGO was the driving force from the beginning.....JMO

I don't know......I find it hard to believe that either party has done anything too *egregious here. You guys are all acting like somebody should go to jail. Thats what I originally came here to say


e·gre·gious

Adjective

1.Outstandingly bad; shocking

No-o-o, we are ALL astounded at the blatant LACK of rational reasoning when a 'twin' site
is running parallel on the board.......EGO has trumped all rational thought....CG has made it
a "chick fight" for all to view......(sad,sad state of affairs)JMO

homeagain wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

homeagain wrote: VL YOUR credibility has been in question from the time you posted your analogy of KFC and what
a FRANCHISE is.......this is NOT a franchise, but yet you vehemently posted that it was.....what
is the REAL definition of an affiliate......APPARENTLY the misconception stems from the words
franchise and/or affiliate......the MACRO view is CG opted to handle this misunderstanding via
a PUBLIC declaration of her intent (creating a "twin" website).....LACK of a forward thinking
action.....(it WILL be proven to be detrimental to her/her associates/her partners/her adv.customers......because EGO was the driving force from the beginning.....JMO

I don't know......I find it hard to believe that either party has done anything too *egregious here. You guys are all acting like somebody should go to jail. Thats what I originally came here to say


e·gre·gious

Adjective

1.Outstandingly bad; shocking

No-o-o, we are ALL astounded at the blatant LACK of rational reasoning when a 'twin' site
is running parallel on the board.......EGO has trumped all rational thought....CG has made it
a "chick fight" for all to view......(sad,sad state of affairs)JMO

Clearly i'm not as upset about it as all of you are.. "Sad" is when a Colorado man is charged in a fatal Venice boardwalk crash. Has anybody heard from Nymisis in the last few days?

VL....the Venice incident is TRAGIC and incomprehensible, sad is a "chick fight" for all to see.JMO

homeagain wrote: VL....the Venice incident is TRAGIC and incomprehensible, sad is a "chick fight" for all to see.JMO

well...point taken :happier:

Vice Lord wrote: I don't know......I find it hard to believe that either party has done anything too *egregious here. You guys are all acting like somebody should go to jail. Thats what I originally came here to say

e·gre·gious

Adjective

1.Outstandingly bad; shocking

So you've said it. Now please take your egregious self and leave.

Mtn Gramma wrote:

Vice Lord wrote: I don't know......I find it hard to believe that either party has done anything too *egregious here. You guys are all acting like somebody should go to jail. Thats what I originally came here to say

e·gre·gious

Adjective

1.Outstandingly bad; shocking

So you've said it. Now please take your egregious self and leave.

lol
#attentionwhore

Mtn Gramma wrote:

Vice Lord wrote: I don't know......I find it hard to believe that either party has done anything too *egregious here. You guys are all acting like somebody should go to jail. Thats what I originally came here to say

e·gre·gious

Adjective

1.Outstandingly bad; shocking

So you've said it. Now please take your egregious self and leave.

VL, no one here has any interest in what you have posted and the thread reflects that. Crawl back under your rock and find some place else to be a troll. Otherwise I'm encouraging everyone to ignore you; that's more attention than you deserve.