Republicans pushing for higher US gas prices

09 Jan 2014 19:51 #61 by whitegp
How much easier could we make it to drill?
If we could double the number of rigs it would half the time to exhaustion of our reserves.
Short term fix followed by severe problems in less time.

But if in doubt. go look at the rig counts. Every drill rig in this country is booked for years in advance unless it is managed by a complete idiot. Yes they are building new ones but the demand for new rigs is a world wide demand, not just the US.

I was reading on your Ethanol post. This is a fuel I agree with. Very inefficient but the knowledge that our Farmers can grow the fuel they need to grow food, has a value and a security. Last year that was about 13.3 billion gallons or about 320 million barrels of ethanol for the year. Not much when you consider it required 40% of our corn production. What caught my eye was the decline in production from 2011, why? weather? corn market?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jan 2014 20:22 #62 by Pony Soldier
We could nationalize the American oil. It is taken from our soil and sold to anyone with no real benefit to the U.S. The socialists don't have everything wrong.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jan 2014 22:55 #63 by MountainRoadCrew

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jan 2014 23:10 #64 by ScienceChic

Reverend Revelant wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: sorry for the sloppy wording, I was trying to dumb it down for you since you were claiming that you had no understanding of it and was requesting explanation.


Where did I say I had "no understanding of it?" You wanted honest debate and right out of the chute you become hateful with a phase "I was trying to dumb it down for you."

My question was "Then tell me. How is this polar vortex created by global warming?" Nothing in that statement indicates I was claiming anything, it wasn't even a declarative sentence.

You don't want honest debate, you want to continue to snark and insult people with your superior "knowledge." I tried to get a conversation going on this polar vortex but I am not going to listen to someone who starts out a conversation with "dumb it down for you."

Forget it.

[youtube:10fvlwkm]
[/youtube:10fvlwkm]

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jan 2014 23:16 #65 by Blazer Bob

ScienceChic wrote:

Reverend Revelant wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: sorry for the sloppy wording, I was trying to dumb it down for you since you were claiming that you had no understanding of it and was requesting explanation.


Where did I say I had "no understanding of it?" You wanted honest debate and right out of the chute you become hateful with a phase "I was trying to dumb it down for you."

My question was "Then tell me. How is this polar vortex created by global warming?" Nothing in that statement indicates I was claiming anything, it wasn't even a declarative sentence.

You don't want honest debate, you want to continue to snark and insult people with your superior "knowledge." I tried to get a conversation going on this polar vortex but I am not going to listen to someone who starts out a conversation with "dumb it down for you."

Forget it.

[youtube:3h7fjdpw]
[/youtube:3h7fjdpw]


I did not watch the whole thing but I did notice the source is the White House. It is sad but true that is not a reputable source. We live in interesting times.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Jan 2014 06:06 #66 by FredHayek

whitegp wrote: How much easier could we make it to drill?
If we could double the number of rigs it would half the time to exhaustion of our reserves.
Short term fix followed by severe problems in less time.

But if in doubt. go look at the rig counts. Every drill rig in this country is booked for years in advance unless it is managed by a complete idiot. Yes they are building new ones but the demand for new rigs is a world wide demand, not just the US.

I was reading on your Ethanol post. This is a fuel I agree with. Very inefficient but the knowledge that our Farmers can grow the fuel they need to grow food, has a value and a security. Last year that was about 13.3 billion gallons or about 320 million barrels of ethanol for the year. Not much when you consider it required 40% of our corn production. What caught my eye was the decline in production from 2011, why? weather? corn market?

Depletion predicted again? Peak oil was predicted to happen decades ago and it didn't. Funny thing reserves are usually a understatement. Why spend money to keep looking when you have enough to pump right now. And if we opened up ANWAR and other restricted sites? Can you be more of an alarmist?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Jan 2014 13:46 #67 by whitegp


From the EIA Fred.
Peak Oil was predicted and for the US did happen decades ago.
For the World we are on the flat spot at the top of the curve.
It is depletion modeling which is conducted by every Oil/Gas outfit in the World from the day they produce a well -- how much is there and how much can we recover? -- and how long will it last?

As for understating reserves do you really think that BP and Shell are not aware of questionable reserves? You didn't read BPs review did you? They covered this very issue. Besides we firmly believe the middle east is overstating their reserves so they get a bigger quota.
And Royal Dutch Shell got their heads handed to them when they overstated reserves a decade ago, they are very careful.

How much Oil do you think is in ANWR?
From my years in Juneau I can tell you that the Oil companies do not want to drill ANWR. Why do you think so many Repubs voted against opening it? The Oil companies see ANWR as a safe on shore already piped bank account, getting more valuable every day. But what would really make ANWR interesting was if the Nat Gas Line was built and they could sell the gas instead of wasting it as they did on the North Slope. Reinjection Technologies are now the norm but until produced they won't know what was lost.

Alarmist? Called reality Fred. All this info is easily available on the web, imagine what the good stuff looks like. You do not choose to really study the matter - no problem.
For me it comes down to a large part of my living being tied to the cost of Diesel in my boat.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Jan 2014 14:04 #68 by FredHayek
Might just have to convert the boat to CNG. Could be right about OPEC fudging the numbers on how much oil reserves they have left, but so many of the countries that have nationalized oil production like Mexico and Venezuela haven't been investing in the technology needed to get the most out of their reserves. The Mexican president is trying to bring back private oil companies to get more production, but the PRI diehards don't want to share the country's wealth.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jan 2014 17:49 #69 by Blazer Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jan 2014 19:32 #70 by ScienceChic

BlazerBob wrote: I did not watch the whole thing but I did notice the source is the White House. It is sad but true that is not a reputable source. We live in interesting times.

Alright, but you asked for it! lol You'll have to sacrifice more than 2 minutes though. :wink: The introductions take until minute 7:15 if you want to skip right to the discussion.
We the Geeks: “Polar Vortex” and Extreme Weather
Posted by Becky Fried on January 08, 2014
[youtube:3jt9iqj4]
[/youtube:3jt9iqj4]
hashtag #WeTheGeeks on Twitter or on Google+

However, since that's still hosted by the White House, let's go to the science, where you'll have to invest a bit more time.

Not a scientist, but includes data from research articles, has good links, and provides a good summary to start:
Polar Vortex in U.S. May be Example of Global Warming
By Andrew Freedman
Published: January 6th, 2014

Some of the science:
Warm Arctic, Cold Continents
A Common Pattern Related to Arctic Sea Ice Melt, Snow Advance, and Extreme Winter Weather

A collection of some study papers since 2001:
The Science of the Polar Vortex and Jet Stream
Added by prokaryotes on January 7, 2014

At least since around 2001 we have study papers connecting the polar vortex / jet stream behavior to anomalies, such as cold weather outbreaks or precipitation changes. The polar vortex phenomenon was described as early as 1853. In recent years studies linked changes in the cryosphere to the polar vortex.

[youtube:3jt9iqj4]
[/youtube:3jt9iqj4]

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.161 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+