Republicans pushing for higher US gas prices

13 Jan 2014 16:31 #71 by PrintSmith

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: the Polar Vortex is actually the jet stream encircling the Arctic which keeps the arctic cold in place . The deflection of the jet stream downward is allowing the Arctic Cold to move downward across North America. This is also referred to as a "stratospheric phenomenon warming event" although that sounds counter intuitive. The deflection of the jet stream (weakening of the Vortex) releases that arctic cold downward over North America. The physics of this action is complex and not fully understood as yet, but the evidence is that as the polar ice cap warms, high pressure builds over the Arctic which weakens the polar jet stream allowing it to deflect downward over North America. At the same time the mid Atlantic jet stream is being strengthened by the warming of the oceans to interact with the deflected Polar Vortex in creating the recent cold weather.

Unfortunately, this portends even further cold weather for North America.

So if I am understanding you correctly, what you are saying is a warmer climate produces colder weather, as well as warmer weather, as well as more and stronger storms, as well as fewer and weaker storms, and less ice in at the northern pole and more ice at the southern one. Maybe global warming was responsible for the severe winter when Washington was camped at Valley Forge as well?

No you are not understanding my explanation of the stratospheric phenomenon warming event. I will see if I can dumb it down even more. There is credible evidence that the warming of the Arctic creates a high pressure system that is causing weakening of the Polar Vortex, which causes deflection of the jet stream downward so that the polar cold pushes downward over North America. I tried to type slowly so maybe you can understand this time.

And it is this same deflection of the vortex that brings unusually warm air from the south up to the north, so the same deflection causes both warming and cooling of weather, right? That's what the video that SC linked to shows, which is the answer to the question that I earlier posed, yes?

The winters during the Revolutionary War were exceptionally cold, occurring during a period known as the "Little Ice Age"? Might a deflection of the Polar Vortex have been responsible for that as well or didn't it exist 230 years ago? There was, after all, a period called the Medieval Warming" that preceded the "Little Ice Age", wasn't there? What caused those?

Now, granted I am not one who ascribes to humans sole responsibility for the current warming trend, as some are, but I am curious to know what the "scientific consensus" is with regards to the cause of the "Little Ice Age". If the current science allows an identification as to why it is happening, it should also be able to explain why earlier warming and cooling cycles touched off, shouldn't it?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Jan 2014 19:24 #72 by Something the Dog Said
The "Little Ice Age" and the "Medival Warm Period" were not global climate changes but instead were independent regional phenomena. The Little Ice Age was actually a modest cooling of less than 1 degree C occurring primarily over the Northern Hemisphere over a period of around 400 years. It was not a singular event as the recent stratospheric polar warming phenomenon (weather) but was a regional climate change. Since modern scientific instrumentation and computer modeling was not available at that time, the causes are not fully understood but were probably a combination of factors including some relating to man. There were numerous volcanoes active at that time, the oceans were undergoing changes in current, and other factors that were not trackable as they are at this time. One interesting factor was the orbital forcing due to cycles in the earth's orbit around the sun had been causing long term cooling in the northern hemisphere at a rate of about .02 degrees C per century. This orbital forcing has recently stopped in the last 150 years due to greenhouse effect. There were also significant solar disruptions during that time period as well as significant volcanic activity.
I am not sure why you attach significance to the winters of 1777 -1778. Those winters were actually considered to be moderate. http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/hi ... ather.html

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Jan 2014 13:37 #73 by Something the Dog Said
Printsmith, don't you find it interesting that Little Ice Age ended relatively abruptly just as the Industrial Revolution began? With no observable forcing other than carbon emissions?

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Feb 2014 10:35 #74 by ScienceChic
"That's How Science Works"

Is the Arctic Really Drunk, or Does It Just Act Like This Sometimes?
The biggest debate in climate science may be over whether global warming will create more winters like this one. If you care about weather, you'd better care about the outcome.
—By Chris Mooney
Fri Feb. 21, 2014

This weather now serves as the backdrop—and perhaps, as the inspiration—for an increasingly epic debate within the field of climate research. You see, one climate researcher, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University, has advanced an influential theory suggesting that winters like this one may be growing more likely to occur.

And yet in a letter to the journal Science last week, five leading climate scientists—mainstream researchers who accept a number of other ideas about how global warming is changing the weather, from worsening heat waves to driving heavier rainfall—strongly contested Francis's jet stream claim, calling it "interesting" but contending that "alternative observational analyses and simulations have not confirmed the hypothesis." One of the authors was the highly influential climate researcher Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, who also appeared on Inquiring Minds this week alongside Francis to debate the matter.

"I applaud Jennifer for raising the issue," Trenberth said on the show, but he argued that much more research is needed,

That's How Science Works
Stepping back and surveying this exchange, what one sees is a model of how science works when it is working well, in the way that it is supposed to. It's the utter opposite of politicized "debates" in which skeptics go to the media to raise issues that are red herrings or already resolved by researchers, and most scientists don't even bother to respond.

So what happens now? Well, every year is more data, which means that every year is an additional scientific test for Francis.


Inquiring Minds Podcast: Jennifer Francis and Kevin Trenberth - Is Global Warming Driving Crazy Winters?

You can watch Francis give a more thorough scientific explanation of the idea here, complete with an impressive video animation of the jet stream:

[youtube:2musxqd5]
[/youtube:2musxqd5]

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.151 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+